Question about the permutations of roots as polynomial coefficients

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the representation of polynomial coefficients in terms of its roots, specifically using the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra (FTOA). It establishes that a polynomial P(x) of degree r can be expressed through its roots u_1, u_2, ..., u_r, with coefficients derived from the sums and products of these roots. The conversation highlights the need for a shorthand notation for combinatorial expressions involving roots, suggesting the use of elementary symmetric polynomials denoted as e_k(u_1,...,u_n) for clarity and conciseness.

PREREQUISITES
  • Fundamental Theorem of Algebra (FTOA)
  • Elementary Symmetric Polynomials
  • Combinatorial Notation (nCr and nPr)
  • Polynomial Functions and Their Properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of Elementary Symmetric Polynomials
  • Explore combinatorial expressions in polynomial theory
  • Learn about the implications of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra in complex analysis
  • Investigate advanced polynomial coefficient representations and their notations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying algebra, and anyone interested in polynomial theory and combinatorial mathematics.

galoisjr
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Ok, so obviously, given some polynomial P(x) of degree r, it has r roots in the complex numbers by the FTOA, and if these roots are u_1, u_2,... it can be written as

\begin{array}{l}<br /> P(x) = (x - {u_1})(x - {u_2})(x - {u_3}) \cdots \\<br /> P(x) = {x^r} - ({u_1} + {u_2} + {u_3} + \ldots ){x^{r - 1}} + ({u_1}{u_2} + {u_1}{u_3} + {u_2}{u_3}+ \ldots){x^{r - 2}} - ({u_1}{u_2}{u_3} + \ldots ){x^{r - 3}} + \ldots<br /> \end{array}

Obviously the coefficient of the r-n power is the sum over the permutations of the r roots taken n at a time.

My question is:

Is there a shorthand notation for referring to this in an equation, i.e. a combinatorial expression in terms of the discrete set of roots?

Obviously when talking about just plain numbers we can refer to the standard nCr and nPr formulas, but in this case we must view the set of roots as a discrete set of objects rather than numbers, hence my dilemma.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That is exactly what I was looking for.

Thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K