A Question about the Poincaré conjecture

AI Thread Summary
Perelman’s proof of the Poincaré conjecture does not imply that the universe is the surface of a 3-sphere. The conjecture applies to closed simply connected 3-manifolds, which are compact and without boundary, while the universe may not be a closed manifold. Additionally, while the universe appears locally simply connected, this does not guarantee that it is globally simply connected. There are many simply connected 3-manifolds that do not conform to the 3-sphere structure. Thus, the relationship between the conjecture and the universe's topology is not straightforward.
donglepuss
Messages
17
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
Does Perelman’s proof of the Poincaré conjecture imply that the universe is the surface of a 3 sphere?
Does Perelman’s proof of the Poincaré conjecture imply that the universe is the surface of a 3 sphere?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
donglepuss said:
TL;DR Summary: Does Perelman’s proof of the Poincaré conjecture imply that the universe is the surface of a 3 sphere?

Does Perelman’s proof of the Poincaré conjecture imply that the universe is the surface of a 3 sphere?
No.
 
  • Like
Likes Office_Shredder
How can a methematical proof tell us anything about the physical universe?
 
  • Like
Likes Hornbein and dextercioby
You haven't provided your reasoning for why you would be curious about this, so I'm left to assume that it's because from our local observations the universe appears to be a simply connected 3-manifold. There are two main reasons this doesn't imply the universe is the 3-sphere:

1) The Poincare conjecture takes as its premise closed simply connected 3-manifolds. These are compact manifolds without boundary. There are an abundance of simply connected 3-manifolds that aren't homeomorphic to the 3-sphere, but they are also non-compact (3-dimensional Euclidean space) or have non-empty boundary (the 3-ball). It is possible that the universe is not a closed manifold.

2) Our observations imply the universe is locally simply connected (i.e. simply connected within some neighborhood of a point). Every manifold is locally simply connected because every manifold is locally Euclidean. However, not every manifold is simply connected.

Hope this helped.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and PeroK
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Back
Top