A Question about the Poincaré conjecture

AI Thread Summary
Perelman’s proof of the Poincaré conjecture does not imply that the universe is the surface of a 3-sphere. The conjecture applies to closed simply connected 3-manifolds, which are compact and without boundary, while the universe may not be a closed manifold. Additionally, while the universe appears locally simply connected, this does not guarantee that it is globally simply connected. There are many simply connected 3-manifolds that do not conform to the 3-sphere structure. Thus, the relationship between the conjecture and the universe's topology is not straightforward.
donglepuss
Messages
17
Reaction score
4
TL;DR Summary
Does Perelman’s proof of the Poincaré conjecture imply that the universe is the surface of a 3 sphere?
Does Perelman’s proof of the Poincaré conjecture imply that the universe is the surface of a 3 sphere?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
donglepuss said:
TL;DR Summary: Does Perelman’s proof of the Poincaré conjecture imply that the universe is the surface of a 3 sphere?

Does Perelman’s proof of the Poincaré conjecture imply that the universe is the surface of a 3 sphere?
No.
 
  • Like
Likes Office_Shredder
How can a methematical proof tell us anything about the physical universe?
 
  • Like
Likes Hornbein and dextercioby
You haven't provided your reasoning for why you would be curious about this, so I'm left to assume that it's because from our local observations the universe appears to be a simply connected 3-manifold. There are two main reasons this doesn't imply the universe is the 3-sphere:

1) The Poincare conjecture takes as its premise closed simply connected 3-manifolds. These are compact manifolds without boundary. There are an abundance of simply connected 3-manifolds that aren't homeomorphic to the 3-sphere, but they are also non-compact (3-dimensional Euclidean space) or have non-empty boundary (the 3-ball). It is possible that the universe is not a closed manifold.

2) Our observations imply the universe is locally simply connected (i.e. simply connected within some neighborhood of a point). Every manifold is locally simply connected because every manifold is locally Euclidean. However, not every manifold is simply connected.

Hope this helped.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and PeroK
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top