Undergrad Question about this "Quantum laser pointer" that I bought

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a quantum laser pointer purchased from quantumlaserpointer.com, which shows a refraction pattern when the cap is removed. The response clarifies that the observed phenomenon is not a quantum effect but rather classical light wave interference, similar to Thomas Young's dual-slit experiment from 1805. It emphasizes that lasers are coherent-state sources rather than single-photon sources, and at low intensities, they behave more like vacuum sources. The conversation highlights the distinction between classical and quantum light behavior. Overall, the laser pointer demonstrates classical wave interference rather than quantum mechanics.
Benplace
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
QuantumLaserPointer.com
I bought one of the lasers from quantumlaserpointer.com
If I remove the cap I can see the two thin slits cut in it.
If I hold the laser around 3ft from a surface it appears to show the refraction pattern.
Is this actually working like the dual slit experiment and the laser photons are going through both slits at the same time?
Thanks,
Ben
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, no quantum effects here. You’re seeing classical light waves interfering with one another, the same purely classical phenomenon that Thomas Young observed around 1805 to show that light is waves of something (waves in the electromagnetic field it turns out, although that took another half-century).
 
I once had a debate at an exhibition during a physics conference with a guy from a school-physics experiment supplier who praised a laser as a "photon source", because I think that's a bit cheating, be cause a laser is not a single-photon source but a "coherent-state" source. If dimmed down to very low intensity it's mostly a "vacuum source", but still not a single-photon source. The result was that the guy gave me a T-shirt for free ;-)).
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K