Question on excitation energy?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter HMS-776
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Excitation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of ionization energy, specifically in relation to the Oxygen atom and its comparison to Hydrogen. Participants explore the implications of ionization energy values, the relationship between energy and wavelength, and clarify misconceptions regarding excitation energy versus ionization energy.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that any energy above the ionization energy will lead to ionization, with higher energy contributing to the kinetic energy of the electron.
  • Others clarify that the ionization energy is the minimum energy required to completely remove an electron from an atom, contrasting it with excitation energy, which only raises the electron to a higher orbital.
  • One participant notes that the 13.6 eV value mentioned is specific to Hydrogen, not Oxygen, and provides a formula for ionization energy in one-electron systems.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the binding energy of the upper electron in Oxygen compared to that in Hydrogen, suggesting they should be of similar order.
  • Some participants reference external sources for ionization energy values, indicating a belief in the significance of these values in the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the specific ionization energy of Oxygen, with participants presenting differing views on its comparison to Hydrogen. Misunderstandings about the definitions of ionization energy and excitation energy are also evident, leading to contested interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the specific values of ionization energy for Oxygen and the implications of energy levels and wavelengths on ionization processes. The discussion reveals a dependence on definitions and the context of one-electron versus multi-electron systems.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying atomic physics, particularly in understanding ionization processes and the distinctions between ionization and excitation energies.

HMS-776
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Just wanted to ask a simple question to clarify my thinking.

The Ionization Energy of an atom is said to be the minimum energy required to bring the electron to it's next higher orbit.

Looking at the Oxygen atom's first ionization energy of 13.6eV. Does this mean that any energy level which is 13.6eV or higher will cause the first ionization to take place?

Does this hold true for wavelength? A wavelength which is shorter than the absorption wavelength will also cause ionization because the shorter wavelength is stronger?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yea, any energy higher than the required energy will cause the ionization. The higher the energy, the more likely the ionization will take place. Also, the surplus of energy will contribute to the kinetic energy of the electron.

A higher energy automatically means a shorter wavelength, so this also holds for this, yes.
 
The ionization energy is the minimum energy that will completely remove the electron out of an atomic orbit and produce a free electron and a negative oxygen ion (with 7 electrons). The maximum wavelength is about 904 Angstroms.
 
There are some misconceptions here, so I'll clear up what I can.

HMS-776 said:
Just wanted to ask a simple question to clarify my thinking.

The Ionization Energy of an atom is said to be the minimum energy required to bring the electron to it's next higher orbit.
No. The Ionization Energy would completely remove an electron from the atom, as Bob S said.
It is the First Excitation Energy that brings an electron to it's next higher orbital.

Looking at the Oxygen atom's first ionization energy of 13.6eV.
That 13.6 eV value is for hydrogen, not oxygen.

Does this mean that any energy level which is 13.6eV or higher will cause the first ionization to take place?
This question doesn't really make sense. A photon of 13.6 eV or more energy can cause ionization -- in hydrogen.

Does this hold true for wavelength? A wavelength which is shorter than the absorption wavelength will also cause ionization because the shorter wavelength is stronger?
Yes, that is true.
 
From HMS-776
Looking at the Oxygen atom's first ionization energy of 13.6eV. Does this mean that any energy level which is 13.6eV or higher will cause the first ionization to take place?
Redbelly98 said:
That 13.6 eV value is for hydrogen, not oxygen..
I stated in another thread by HMS-776 that the ionization energy for one-electron bound states of atoms is
eV = 13.6 Z2/n2.
Oxygen has Z = 8, so the 1S electron binding energy is 870 eV.
 
Bob S said:
I stated in another thread by HMS-776 that the ionization energy for one-electron bound states of atoms is eV = 13.6 Z2/n2.
Oxygen has Z = 8, so the 1S electron binding energy is 870 eV.

?:confused:

I think that the upper electron is as bound to the Oxygen ion O+ as the Hydrogen electron to proton so the Oxygen ionization energy should be of the same order (13 eV or so).

The excitation probability or cross section depends on the projectile energy in a specific way: it is zero before the ionization energy threshold, then it grows with the energy, attains a maximum and then decreases.
 
Bob_for_short;2345494I think that the upper electron is as bound to the Oxygen ion O[SUP said:
+[/SUP] as the Hydrogen electron to proton so the Oxygen ionization energy should be of the same order (13 eV or so).
QUOTE]
Thanks, short Bob. You are right, as usual. See Table of ionization energies (comma = period):
http://www.lenntech.com/Periodic-chart-elements/ionization-energy.htm
Long Bob
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K