Question on reducing 3 equations with 3 unknowns

  • Thread starter majon
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Unknowns
In summary: So, in summary, to solve a system of equations involving three unknowns, you can either solve them for one unknown using methods like those listed above, or you can multiply the first equation by a_2 and the second equation by a_1 to get two equations in two unknowns each.
  • #1
majon
8
0
Say I have a system of equations of the following form:

a_1 A^2 + b_1 B^2 + c_1 C^2 + d_1 = f_1
a_2 A^2 + b_2 B^2 + c_2 C^2 + d_2 = f_2
a_3 A^2 + b_3 B^2 + c_3 C^2 + d_3 = f_3

Where a,b,c,d,f are coefficients, and A,B and C are unknown variables.

1. Can we write them in terms of two variables only?
2. Can we write them in terms of one variable only?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If you replace the A^2 with AA and similarly with B and C then you have 3 linear eqns in AA, BB, and CC that can be easily solved using matrix methods.
 
  • #3
I was asking because I was reading a document where the author deals with 3 equations and 3 unknown parameters, each equation has quadratic dependence on each of the 3 parameters. Then the author says: with these three equations and three parameters we can reduce the equations to two second order equations with respect to two unknowns (call this case 1), or to one quartic equation with respect to one unknown (call this case 2). So I wanted to know how to do this. I'll do the exercise by eliminating one of the variable and see what I get.
 
  • #4
Ad jedishrfu said, in the given equation, since only the squares of the unknown values occur, we can treat them as, say X=A^2, Y= B^2, and Z= C^2. Then the equations become a_1X+ b_1Y+ c_1Z= f_1, a_2X+ b_2Y+ c_2Z= f_2, and a_3X+ b_3Y+ c_3Z= f_3. (There is no need for the separate 'd_1' and 'f_1'- we can always subtract d_1 from both sides of the equation.)

There are many ways to solve a "system of equations" but, yes, they all basically involve reducing from three equations in three unknowns to two equations in two unknowns and then to one equation in one unknown. For example, if a_2 is non-zero, I can solve the first equation for X: a_1X= f_1- b_1Y- c_1Z so X= (f_1-b_1X- c_1Z)/a_1. Now replace "X" in the other two equations by that to get two equations in Y and Z only.

Or:
1) multiply the first equation by a_2 to get
a_1a_2X+ b_1a_2Y+ c_1a_2Z= f_1a_2 and
2) multiply the second equation by a_1 to get
a)a_1a_2X+ a_1b_2Y+ a_2c_3Z= a_2f_3. Now
3) subtract those two equation. Since the X term in each equation has the same coefficient, a_1a_2, they cancel leaving a single equation in Y and Z.

Do the same with, say, the first and third equation, to get a second equation in Y and Z.
 
  • #5


1. Yes, it is possible to reduce these equations to two variables. This can be done by using substitution or elimination methods. By solving for one variable in terms of the other two in one equation, we can then substitute this expression into the other two equations, effectively reducing the system to two equations with two unknowns.

2. It is not possible to write these equations in terms of one variable only. This is because each equation contains three unknown variables, and in order to solve for one variable, we need to have at least three equations. Therefore, we cannot reduce the system to a single equation with a single unknown variable.
 

1. How do you solve a system of equations with 3 unknowns?

To solve a system of equations with 3 unknowns, you need to have 3 equations. Then, you can use various methods such as substitution, elimination, or matrices to reduce the equations and solve for the unknown variables.

2. Can you use any method to reduce 3 equations with 3 unknowns?

Yes, you can use any method that you are familiar with and comfortable using. Some methods may be more efficient depending on the specific equations and unknowns involved.

3. What should I do if I get a negative solution when reducing 3 equations with 3 unknowns?

If you get a negative solution, it means that the equations are inconsistent and do not have a common solution. This could be due to a mistake in the equations or the equations being impossible to solve together.

4. Is there a shortcut or trick to reducing 3 equations with 3 unknowns?

There is no specific shortcut or trick to reducing 3 equations with 3 unknowns. However, being familiar with different methods and practicing regularly can help make the process more efficient and easier to solve.

5. Can a system of equations with 3 unknowns have multiple solutions?

Yes, a system of equations with 3 unknowns can have multiple solutions. This means that there are different combinations of values for the unknown variables that satisfy all 3 equations. However, there can also be cases where there is no solution or only one unique solution.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
751
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
2
Replies
62
Views
3K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
785
Back
Top