Question on Tachyon Correlator (Green Schwarz Witten)

  • Thread starter earth2
  • Start date
  • #1
86
0
I'm reading through chapter 7 of Green-Schwarz-Witten and I have a problem with the derivation of the M-tachyon correlation function. Basically I'm trying to get 7.A.17 from 7.A.12 and eq 7.A.22 in the appendix of the first volume.

Basically I want to prove:

$$\langle\frac{V(k_1,y_1)...V(k_M,y_M)}{y_1...y_M}\rangle=\prod_{i < j}(y_i-y_j)^{k_ik_j}$$

with $$V(k_i,y_i)=e^{ik_iX(k_i)}$$

If I try to get this by just plugging everything into $$\langle:e^{A_1}:...:e^{A_M}:\rangle=e^{\sum_{i<j}<A_iA_j>}$$ using $$\langle X(y_i)^{\mu}X(y_j)^\nu\rangle=-\eta^{\mu\nu}log(y_i-y_j)$$ I somehow still have the $$\frac{1}{y_1...y_M}$$ factor in the formula above existing on the right hand side of the first equation. How is that cancelled in this approach? I dont see it.

More specifically I have

$$\langle\frac{V_1...V_M}{y_1...y_M}\rangle=\frac{1}{y_1...y_M}\langle V(k_1,y_1)...V(k_M,y_M)\rangle=\frac{1}{y_1...y_M}e^{(\sum_{i<j}k_i^\mu\langle X_iX_j\rangle k_j^\nu)}$$ $$=\frac{1}{y_1...y_M}e^{(\sum_{i<j}k_ik_jlog(y_i-y_j))}=\frac{1}{y_1...y_M}\prod_{i<j}(y_i-y_j)^{k_ik_j}$$
which is the result I want to have up to that nasty prefactor that I cant make sense of.

Edit: I also posted this on stackexchange but didnt get an answer :(
Btw, this is not a homework question. I'm reading it on my own.
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
fzero
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,119
289
You have to look back at eq (7.1.6), where the zero-mode part of the tachyon vertex operator was computed. The ##\pm 1## in the exponent of ##z## comes from normal-ordering the zero mode operators ##\hat{x}^\mu, \hat{p}^\mu##. It is precisely this exponent that leads to the factors of ##y_i## in the n-pt function.
 
  • #3
86
0
Hi fzero,

Thanks for your answer but I'm not sure I understand it in the context of the equations above. Would you be so could to make it more precise w.r.t. the formulae I used above. That would be very nice since i'm banging my head against this for a while now. Moreover, this point is important for all the computations in this chapter after that...so i would really like to understand it.
 
  • #4
8
0
You have to look back at eq (7.1.6), where the zero-mode part of the tachyon vertex operator was computed. The ##\pm 1## in the exponent of ##z## comes from normal-ordering the zero mode operators ##\hat{x}^\mu, \hat{p}^\mu##. It is precisely this exponent that leads to the factors of ##y_i## in the n-pt function.

To fzero :

The question of earth2 is in fact, how to obtain [itex]7.A.17[/itex] from [itex]7.A.12[/itex] and [itex]7.A.22[/itex] (appendix of the first volume), because you have a curious overall term [itex]y_1......y_M[/itex]
 
  • #5
86
0
Thanks Trimok for clearing that up :) As mentioned on phys stackexchange, I would like to understand this, since GSW say in the appendix that getting 7.A.17 is possible from 7.A.12 and 7.A.22... :)
 
  • #6
fzero
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,119
289
If we really want to understand this factor, then we should restore the factors of ##\alpha'## and note that it is

$$\prod_i y^{\alpha' k_i^2 }.$$

GSW refer to 7.A.22 as a mnemonic to recover 7.A.17, but don't actually tell you what value of ##\lambda## you need. It seems that the appropriate version of 7.A.22 is something like

$$\langle X^\mu (y_i) X^\nu (y_j) \rangle = - 2\alpha' \eta^{\mu\nu} \log (y_i-y_j) - 2\alpha' \eta^{\mu\nu} \delta_{ij} \log y_i. $$

The 2nd term computes the zero-mode contribution to a modified version of 7.A.12, which is something like

$$\begin{split}
\langle :e^{A_1}: :e^{A_2}: \cdots :e^{A_M}: \rangle & = \exp \left[ \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i,j} \langle A_i A_j \rangle \right] \\
& = \exp \left[ \sum_{i<j} \langle A_i A_j \rangle \right] + \exp \left[ \frac{1}{2} \sum_i \langle A_i A_i \rangle \right] .
\end{split}~~~(*) $$

The term in the correlator gives something like

$$ \exp \left[ 2\alpha' \sum_{i<j} k_i\cdot k_j \log y_i + \alpha' \sum_i k_i^2 \log y_i \right]
= \prod_i y_i ^{\alpha'k_i^2} \prod_{i<j} y_i^{2\alpha' k_i\cdot k_j }, $$

which should be compared with 7.A.16.

This isn't a clean-cut derivation, since (*) introduces some divergences from the nonzero mode part that must be regularized away. For this reason, it is advisable to look at Polchinski, who is more careful about how to deal with the normal ordering regularization in the CFT correlators, as well as in the discussion of zero-modes and momentum conservation.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #7
86
0
Thanks fzero! Since both - Trimok and you - suggested to look at Polchinksi I will do so :) To the Library...!
 

Related Threads on Question on Tachyon Correlator (Green Schwarz Witten)

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
758
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
824
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
57
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
4K
Top