Question Regarding Determining the Mass of Venus

  • Level: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter astropi
  • Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Venus
2 replies · 2K views · last reply
astropi
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Trying to determine the "strange" units this paper is using.
Venus is in the news! I looked up this well-regarded paper by A. S. Konopliv, W. B. Banerdt, and W. L. Sjogren
Venus Gravity: 180th Degree and Order Model
They list values for GM (see attached picture), such as
GM 324858.63 ± 0.01
so in principle calculating M should be trivial. The problem is I am orders of magnitude off from the actual value. I thought perhaps they were using cgs units, but that gives a value for M that is 15 orders of magnitude off. Clearly, I'm missing something. I looked through the paper and couldn't find anything that clarified the situation. Anyone know the units they are using or what I am missing? Thanks in advance.

Edit: Just to clarify, this is NOT for homework or any school related activity. Simply my own understanding.
 
Attachments
  • Table I, GM and normalized harmonic coefficients of degree 2 and formal sigma values for four gravity models, with columns 60x60, 90x90, 120x120 and 180x180 and rows for GM and the C and S coefficients.
    Screenshot from 2020-09-18 05-51-56.png
    11.5 KB · Views: 248
Wikipedia said:
In celestial mechanics, the standard gravitational parameter μ of a celestial body is the product of the gravitational constant G and the mass M of the body.
\mu =GM\

For several objects in the Solar System, the value of μ is known to greater accuracy than either G or M.The SI units of the standard gravitational parameter are ##m^3 s^{−2}##. However, units of ##km^3 s^{−2}## are frequently used in the scientific literature and in spacecraft navigation.
That's your 9 orders of magnitude difference.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stefan r and astropi
Thanks Bandersnatch, in retrospect that should have been pretty obvious!