Question related to a 3D finite spherical well

ClaireBear1596
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I have a particle in a spherical well with the conditions that V(r) = 0 is r < a, and V(r) = V0 if r ≥ a.
In this problem we are only considering the l=0 in the radial equation.
After solving this I found that in the region 0<r<a, u(r)=Bsin(kr) (k=√2mE/hbar), and in the other region, u(r)=Bexp(-la) (l=√2m(E+V0/hbar). I was supposed to show that in order to find E I needed to solve a transcendental equation of the form sinθ=±ςθ, however my result was l=ktan(ka), so I am unsure what to do with this.

Also, I was wondering why is it that there is a possibility of there being no bound states if V0 is too small? And how would I go about finding this minimum potential?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ClaireBear1596 said:
u(r)=Bsin(kr)
is a little hard to understand. Could you show the steps you took to find it ?
 
BvU said:
is a little hard to understand. Could you show the steps you took to find it ?
Sorry, I actually figured out the problem with that part of my question. I still don't understand however why it is that there will always be a bound state in the 1D case of a (finite) well, whereas there will not always be one with the 3D case?
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

Back
Top