** Question related to Orbital speed of star, Keep getting *10^4 to high?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the orbital speed of a star in a binary system with a planet, given specific masses and distances. The context is rooted in gravitational dynamics and orbital mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the distance from the center of mass to the star and the implications of using this distance in the speed formula. There are questions about whether the radius used should be that of the planet or the star, and how the period of the planet's orbit relates to the star's motion.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, exploring different interpretations of the radius needed for the speed calculation. Some have provided alternative methods and reasoning, while others express uncertainty about the accuracy of their calculations and the relevance of the period of wobble.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted discrepancy in the expected outcome of the speed calculation, with participants questioning the values used and the assumptions made regarding the center of mass. The problem's wording suggests a level of approximation, which is being debated.

pargeterw
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
*Please Help* Question related to Orbital speed of star, Keep getting *10^4 to high??

Homework Statement



A star has a mass of 2.2*1030kg, there is a planet of mass 4.5*1027kg orbiting it at a distance of 3.1*1011m (also told that it has a "period of wobble" of 9.2*107s due to the orbiting of the planet)

The start is orbiting about the centre of mass of the star/planet system.

Show that the speed of the star in its circular orbit is about 50m/s

Homework Equations



v=sqrt((G*M)/r)
where G=6.67*10-11m3/kg/s2
M=mass of orbiting object
r=radius of orbit

The Attempt at a Solution



I know M=2.2*1030
I know G=6.67*10-11
so I only need r

r is the distance from C.O.M of the Star/planet system to the star, and it follows that this would equal ((4.5*1027)*(3.1*1011))/((4.5*1027)+(2.2*1030)) = 6.33*108
because <x>=(∑mixi)/(∑mi)

therefore substituting M, G, and r into the equation for v should, one would hope, give about 50m/s

it does in fact, give 48*104.

this is slightly hopeful, as 48≈50, although not correct, as 104 ≠ 1!

does anybody have any idea what I got wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi pargeterw! welcome to pf! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
pargeterw said:
r is the C.O.M of the Star/planet, so it follows that it would be at a distance of ((4.5*10^27)*(3.1*10^11))/((4.5*10^27)+(2.2*10^30)) = 6.33*10^8

erm :redface:

that's the distance of the c.o.m. from the star! :rolleyes:
 


tiny-tim said:
that's the distance of the c.o.m. from the star! :rolleyes:

I know that, isn't that the distance that I want?
 
Last edited:


so distance of star from com as you say is r= 6.33E8.
period of orbit = 9.2E7
Circular orbit is 2.*pi. r/T = 43ms^-1
 
no, you want the orbital radius r of the planet,

ie the distance of the planet from the c.o.m.

(though since the question says "about", i think you're supposed to pretend that r is just the distance given, between the planet and the star :wink:)
 


Why do I want the orbital distance of the planet when I'm trying to work out the orbital speed of the star?
 


@ppzmis - you seem to have the right answer, which is encouraging, how can you have used the Time "period of wobble" since surely this is caused by the orbiting of the planet around the star, and I'm trying to calculate the speed of the star about the C.O.M of the system?

EDIT - although surely 43m/s is about 40m/s not about 50m/s? so looking less encouraging now :(
 


My thought was that the time period of the wobble is related to the planet moving around the star but both star and planet must orbit around the centre of mass with the same period. Otherwise if you think about a star and planet orbiting around a point in space you could end up with the impossible situation where the star and planet are both on the same side of the centre of mass!

43 is ~50 to 1 sig fig! I reckon that with those numbers and the question as it stands that is the right answer. Check you've copied the numbers correctly. The radius of orbit of the star is 6.34E8 but that won't make much difference.
 


You're right about the Time period being relevant, but it appears that the main cause of the problem was me trying to be too clever for the question and cut a corner with the centre of mass thing. The truth is that both methods should work, and yours (stemming from my cheating ways) only produces a lower value than it should because the values in the question are not accurately fabricated. The most annoying thing is that while it was a completely valid method, it was not on the mark scheme, and would barely have got me any marks, if at all. I did however work out the answer the long way around, see below for your interest

Thanks a lot for helping though!

Will

v=(2πr)/T and a=(v2/r)

now a=F/M and F=(GMm)/R2
so a=((6.67*10-11)*(4.5*1027))/((3.1*1011)2)
so a=3.12*10-6ms-2

if you do some re-arranging of the first two formulae,

a=(v2/r) --------> r=(v2)/a
and since v=(2πr)/T --------> r=(a*T2)/(4π2)

Substituting that into v=(2πr)/T and cancelling like crazy gives

v=(aT)/(2π)

v=((3.12*10-6)*(9.2*107))/(2π)

v= 45.68ms-1 ≈ 50ms-1 QED

:)
 
  • #10


Also,

ppzmis said:
The radius of orbit of the star is 6.34E8 but that won't make much difference.

How did you get that? It's 6.327965525*108 according to my calculator...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K