Geometry Question: What is Geometry Revisited by Coxeter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter micromass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometry
AI Thread Summary
"Geometry Revisited" by H. S. M. Coxeter and Samuel L. Greitzer is a comprehensive resource aimed at high school students and undergraduates, focusing on advanced geometric concepts often not covered in standard curricula. The book is particularly beneficial for those preparing for math competitions like AMC VIII to AMC XII, providing insights into various theorems and properties related to triangles, circles, and transformations. While some readers appreciate its utility for contest preparation, others find it lacks depth compared to Coxeter's "Introduction to Geometry." The text emphasizes using established geometric principles to solve problems efficiently, which can be appealing for competitive contexts. Overall, it serves as a valuable tool for students looking to enhance their understanding of geometry and improve their problem-solving skills in mathematics competitions.

For those who have used this book

  • Lightly don't Recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Strongly don't Recommend

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    7
micromass
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
22,169
Reaction score
3,327

Table of Contents:
Code:
[LIST]
[*] Preface
[*] Points and Lines Connected with a Triangle
[LIST]
[*] The extended Law of Sines
[*] Ceva's theorem
[*] Points of interest
[*] The incircle and excircles
[*] The Steiner-Lehmus theorem
[*] The orthic triangle
[*] The medial triangle and Euler line
[*] The nine-point circle
[*] Pedal triangles
[/LIST]
[*] Some Properties of Circles
[LIST]
[*] The power of a point with respect to a circle
[*] The radical axis of two circles
[*] Coaxal circles
[*] More on the altitudes and orthocenter of a triangle
[*] Simson lines
[*] Ptolemy's theorem and its extension
[*] More on Simson lines
[*] The Butterfly
[*] Morley's theorem
[/LIST]
[*] Collinearity and Concurrence
[LIST]
[*] Quadrangles; Varignon's theorem
[*] Cyclic quadrangles; Brahmagupta's formula
[*] Napoleon triangles
[*] Menelaus's theorem
[*] Pappus's theorem
[*] Perspective triangles; Desargues's theorem
[*] Hexagons
[*] Pascal's theorem
[*] Brianchon's theorem
[/LIST]
[*] Transformations
[LIST]
[*] Translation
[*] Rotation
[*] Half-turn
[*] Reflection
[*] Fagnano's problem
[*] The three jug problem
[*] Dilatation
[*] Spiral similarity
[*] A genealogy of transformations
[/LIST]
[*] An Introduction to Inversive Geometry
[LIST]
[*] Separation
[*] Cross ratio
[*] Inversion
[*] The inversive plane
[*] Orthogonality
[*] Feuerbach's theorem
[*] Coaxal circles
[*] Inversive distance
[*] Hyperbolic functions
[/LIST]
[*] An Introduction to Projective Geometry
[LIST]
[*] Reciprocation
[*] The polar circle of a triangle 
[*] Conics
[*] Focus and directrix
[*] The projective plane
[*] Central conics
[*] Stereographic and gnomonic projection
[/LIST]
[*] Hints and Answers to Exercises
[*] References
[*] Glossary
[*] Index 
[/LIST]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Good for high school math competitions. Almost all the topics are not covered in a standard high school math course.
 
The Book is used for AMC VIII to AMC XII.The best book ever written for Mathematics Olympiad Geometry.
 
It seems that the best thing people can say about this book is that it helps you to win high school math competitions.

I read this book after finishing my undergraduate degree in mathematics. I found it enjoyable, but I preferred Coxeter's Introduction to Geometry because it had more depth and breadth.
 
I agree. I am not nuts about this book. Winning contests involves using facts that you may not understand fully how to prove. This book is like that. E.g. the discussion of the "power of the point" claims correctly that this theorem of Euclid is an easy corollary of the principle of similarity. True enough.

However what they do not mention is that the theory of similarity is quite deep, and was not available to Euclid when he proved this theorem, so he gave a different proof using Pythagoras. Indeed if one uses Euclid's proof, then one can use this result to deduce the important principle of similarity without going to as much difficulty as is usually done.

If like me you are interested in the logical connections between different results, then you believe in doing them in logical order, not assuming the most difficult and deep ones first without justification, and then using them to make other results appear easy.

If however you want to solve contest problems quickly, then you want to use all the big guns available on the littlest peanut problems, in order to dispatch them in enough time to finish the test with the highest possible score. There is no harm in this, and I was myself so motivated in high school, but not so much any more.
 
TL;DR Summary: Book after Sakurai Modern Quantum Physics I am doing a comprehensive reading of sakurai and I have solved every problem from chapters I finished on my own, I will finish the book within 2 weeks and I want to delve into qft and other particle physics related topics, not from summaries but comprehensive books, I will start a graduate program related to cern in 3 months, I alreadily knew some qft but now I want to do it, hence do a good book with good problems in it first...
TLDR: is Blennow "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" a good follow-up to Altland "Mathematics for physicists"? Hello everybody, returning to physics after 30-something years, I felt the need to brush up my maths first. It took me 6 months and I'm currently more than half way through the Altland "Mathematics for physicists" book, covering the math for undergraduate studies at the right level of sophystication, most of which I howewer already knew (being an aerospace engineer)...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Poll Poll
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
27
Views
10K
Replies
12
Views
11K
Back
Top