The forum discussion critiques an article by Max Tegmark published in Scientific American regarding the concept of parallel universes. Participants express skepticism about the speculative nature of the claims, particularly the assertion of distances to copies of our galaxy. While some defend the article as thought-provoking and scientifically valid, others argue that it strays into philosophy rather than solid science. The consensus leans towards disappointment in the journal's current editorial direction, with several users indicating they have canceled their subscriptions.
PREREQUISITESReaders interested in cosmology, theoretical physics, and the evolution of scientific discourse, particularly those evaluating the credibility of popular science publications.
marcus said:What I hear is people saying they canceled their subscriptions. The wisest course may be not trying to renew your faith in SA. Just accept that the magazines good years are over