B Questions about a paper on reconciling JWST and HST data

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Cerenkov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    jwst Paper
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding a paper that reconciles data from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). The authors argue that modifications to the ΛCDM cosmological model to account for JWST's findings would conflict with established HST data, suggesting that the JWST mass excess problem may not have a straightforward cosmological solution. The conversation also touches on the UV galaxy luminosity function, with a recommendation to refer to a seminal paper for deeper insights. Overall, the importance of HST data in interpreting new observations is emphasized, highlighting its role in shaping our understanding of early-universe cosmology. The discussion concludes with a consensus on the need for a comprehensive understanding of the cosmological model in light of new findings.
Cerenkov
Messages
315
Reaction score
88
TL;DR Summary
https://astrobites.org/2024/02/17/cosmic-inconsistencies/
https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.07049
Insights from HST into Ultra-Massive Galaxies and Early-Universe Cosmology
Hello.


I came across this article, https://astrobites.org/2024/02/17/cosmic-inconsistencies/ and followed the link to this paper, https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.07049 Insights from HST into Ultra-Massive Galaxies and Early-Universe Cosmology and have read the .pdf

For the moment I have just one request.

Could the conclusion that the authors make please be explained to me in Basic terms so that I can gain a better understanding of what is meant? I would like to better understand the UV galaxy luminosity function and also what the authors mean when they refer to a cosmological solution to the JWST abundance problem.

Thank you for any help given,


Cerenkov.

 
Space news on Phys.org
Cerenkov said:
Could the conclusion that the authors make please be explained to me in Basic terms.
The article you linked does this well:

The findings from JWST observations have presented a challenge to the existing models of galaxy formation and early-Universe cosmology that led to a reevaluation of our cosmological model. Today’s paper demonstrated that any modifications to the cosmological model enough to explain the JWST data would be in conflict with the well-established HST data. Their analysis implies that a cosmological solution to the JWST mass excess problem might not be the most favored. Moving forward, the extensively validated HST data emerges as a crucial tool for interpreting future observations, signalling the importance of leveraging its well-established insights in shaping our understanding of the universe.

Edit: or even more basic terms:

Changing the ΛCDM model so that it predicts more massive galaxies at high redshifts is a bad idea because the changed model contradicts too many other observations.

Cerenkov said:
I would like to better understand the UV galaxy luminosity function
I don't think cherry-picking technical subjects is a good way to learn (one lacks the necessary background understanding and context), but if you insist the seminal paper is Charles C. Steidel et al 1999 ApJ 519 1.

Cerenkov said:
also what the authors mean when they refer to a cosmological solution to the JWST abundance problem
This refers to changing the ΛCDM model so that it predicts more massive galaxies at high redshifts.

Cerenkov said:
Thank you for any help given,
Although the Astrobites article is good, you might find JWST Sees More Galaxies than Expected more accessible.
 
Last edited:
Many thanks, pbuk. :smile:

You were right, btw. Your linked article was just what I needed to read to understand this better.


Thanks again,

Cerenkov.
 
Regarding the discrepancy between the abundance of massive galaxies in the early universe and the ΛCDM cosmological model, this other paper presents a possible explanation for this abundance within the framework of the ΛCDM model.
 
Many thanks for this, Jaime.

Cerenkov.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top