Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Questions about Bell's Theorem

  1. Jul 18, 2011 #1
    from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement" [Broken]

    so far so good. makes sense. the maximum number of mismatches (between A and C) can only be (1/100) + (1/100) = 2%

    yet in Quantum Entanglement (QE) the number of mismatches is, say, = 4%

    however if there were hidden variables (in QE) the mismatch rate would be only 2% as calculated above. thus the hidden variable hypothesis weakens.

    This is a chance for folks like me to understand it better. i thought the spin value is plus 1/2 or minus 1/2.

    how is another value possible?

    Let's assume x-axis. We measure spin at 0 degrees, 40 degrees and 80 degrees say.....we can only get -1/2 or +1/2 how are other values possible? what does the above mean?


    between entangled photons: is the correlation not the same in all directions? does only one direction, generally, have 100% correlation?

    what would be the actual (relative) value of the angle where A and B would be 99% correlated?

    however can we entangle photons such that say along both x-axis and y-axis (separately) the correlation (between entangled photons) is 100%?

    .

    Why does the correlation drop from 100% to 99%?

    so say at some angle (and we call it 0 degrees) along some axis there is 100% correlation but as we change the angle the correlation drops? why? anything to do with Malus law?

    also here we have considered only one axis. if the correlation between two photons along, say x-axis, was 100%, what correlation can we expect along y and z axis?

    this is conceptually understandable from the statistical coin-flips example above.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Jul 18, 2011 #2

    xts

    User Avatar

    What text do you cite?

    " This is a chance for folks like me to understand it better. i thought the spin value is plus 1/2 or minus 1/2. How is another value possible? "
    if we speak about electrons (other fermions) you are right. If about photons: +1/-1. But that doesn't matter for the problem. A,B,C just denote the results of spin measurments if the axis of detector (polarizator, Stern-Gerlach magnet...) is such and such. A,B,C may take only two values {1,-1} for photons, {1/2, -1/2} for electrons.

    Let's assume x-axis. We measure spin at 0 degrees, 40 degrees and 80 degrees say.....we can only get -1/2 or +1/2 how are other values possible? what does the above mean?


    " is the correlation not the same in all directions? does only one direction, generally, have 100% correlation? "
    We put one detector at some axis, and other rotated by some angle. If they are parallel - output is fully correlated. If perpendicular - there is no correlation.

    " what would be the actual (relative) value of the angle where A and B would be 99% correlated? "
    [itex]corr=\cos^2(\theta)\, \rightarrow\, \theta\approx 6^{\circ}[/itex]

    " however can we entangle photons such that say along both x-axis and y-axis (separately) the correlation (between entangled photons) is 100%? "
    Sure. For entangled photons correlation for every possible axis is 100% if both detectors are in parallel.


    " Why does the correlation drop from 100% to 99%? ... anything to do with Malus law? "
    Exactly! That is Malus law.


    " if the correlation between two photons along, say x-axis, was 100%, what correlation can we expect along y and z axis? "
    Two would be enough, you can't measure polarisation parallel to the beam :frown:
    Of course, correlation along any axis is 100% if both detectors are in parallel.
     
  4. Jul 18, 2011 #3
    thanks xts. the link is from Wikipedia and i have inserted it into the original post now. i think you have answered 90% or more of my queries.

    let me digest it and I will come back if i have anymore.

    i don't get this fully. the detectors are parallel to each other or to the polarization direction of the photons?

    since the photons are separated, how do we figure out the x-axis of photon A corresponds to what axis of photon B?

    i think i got it --- we can use the polarization direction as the base direction and thus the photons are now "direction synchronized" for experimental purpose/calculations


    on a separate note:

    since the photons are perfectly correlated (spin wise in same direction).

    Isn't placing detectors on each of the photons at an angle is (in a sense), equivalent to

    putting just one detector on just any one of the photons..........at the same angles to the polarization/chosen direction?
     
    Last edited: Jul 18, 2011
  5. Jul 18, 2011 #4

    xts

    User Avatar

    "the detectors are parallel to each other or to the polarization direction of the photons?"
    If the detectors are parallel to each other the correlation is 100%.

    "since the photons are separated, how do we figure out the x-axis of photon A corresponds to what axis of photon B?"
    We measure that with our detectors. If both detectors are parallel (let's say vertical) than if both detectors click we know both photons were vertical.


    "since the photons are perfectly correlated ..."
    Sorry - I can't get what you ask about...
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Questions about Bell's Theorem
  1. Questions about Bell (Replies: 129)

Loading...