Questions about papers on Mathematical Physics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical foundations necessary for pursuing research in mathematical physics. Participants explore various mathematical areas that contribute to physics, the applicability of these areas depending on specific fields of physics, and recommendations for self-study resources.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that areas such as functional analysis, topology, measure theory, complex analysis, representation theory, group theory, and differential geometry are important for physics.
  • It is noted that the relevance of mathematical concepts can vary significantly depending on the specific area of physics one intends to pursue.
  • One participant mentions that while category theory may not seem widely applicable, it has found use in quantum foundations.
  • There is a discussion about the potential utility of module theory in chemical physics, though its necessity is questioned.
  • Some participants express interest in learning differential and algebraic geometry, functional analysis, and measure theory as foundational areas.
  • One participant raises the question of whether it is realistic to axiomatize physics, indicating interest in the foundations of physics.
  • Constructive quantum field theory is mentioned as an area of research, with concerns about job prospects in that field.
  • Participants seek recommendations for books on mathematical physics to aid in their self-study.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that various mathematical areas are relevant to physics, but there is no consensus on which are the most critical, as this depends on the specific field of physics being pursued. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to self-study and the applicability of certain mathematical concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the necessity of certain mathematical areas for specific fields of physics, and there are limitations in the discussion regarding the depth of knowledge required for various topics.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and researchers interested in the intersection of mathematics and physics, particularly those looking to understand the mathematical foundations necessary for various fields within physics.

Jimmy84
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone
Im going to start a major in physics next year and I would like to follow mathematical physics afterwards but I lack knowledge about which are the areas of math that contribute the most to the development of physics. For instance I know that differential geometry, functional analysis and abstract algebra specially group theory have deep implications for physics.

I would like to be prepared to write papers and to learn on my own beforehand the most applicable branches of math without having all the knowledge and advantages that a phD students has.

Which books are the best ones to learn mathematical physics?

Which mathematical background do I need in order to learn C algebras?

Which are the areas of math that are the most useful to do research for mathematical physics?

Thanks a lot in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There are lots of areas of math to study for physics. Some are Functional Analysis, Topology, some Measure Theory, Complex Analysis, Representation Theory, Group Theory and Differential Geometry. The actual uses of these topics becomes apparent when you study more and need to develop more tools.
 
It really depends on what area of physics you plan on entering, as the mathematical aspects vary widely depending on the field. Even pure-mathematical concepts that might not seem like they can be applied to physics have found ways to creep into the study.

For example, it seems unlikely to me that there are many areas of physics that would require an in-depth knowledge of category theory, but I do have a friend working in Quantum Foundations that uses it a fair bit. I think module theory is used in chemical physics but not widely, and hence probably wouldn't be worth studying (other than possibly the repercussions of representation theory).

I cannot speak for things like condensed matter physics and the like, but if you plan on going into relativity theory or quantum mechanics a good short list would be functional analysis, group theory, and differential geometry.
 
Kreizhn said:
It really depends on what area of physics you plan on entering, as the mathematical aspects vary widely depending on the field. Even pure-mathematical concepts that might not seem like they can be applied to physics have found ways to creep into the study.

For example, it seems unlikely to me that there are many areas of physics that would require an in-depth knowledge of category theory, but I do have a friend working in Quantum Foundations that uses it a fair bit. I think module theory is used in chemical physics but not widely, and hence probably wouldn't be worth studying (other than possibly the repercussions of representation theory).

I cannot speak for things like condensed matter physics and the like, but if you plan on going into relativity theory or quantum mechanics a good short list would be functional analysis, group theory, and differential geometry.

Thanks, I am looking perhaps for a field of math that might not be the most difficult or technical but that could allow myself to be able to write papers about it at some point.
I intend to learn on my own some differential and algebraic geometry. But lately I have been considering learning more about functional analysis and measure theory.
Im also interested in the foundations of physics.
What do you guys think about that, is it a realistic enterprise to axiomatize physics ?

Another interesting area of research is constructive quantum field theory. But I can imagine it might be very difficult to find a job in that area.
What is the mathematical background needed in order to figure out that problem?
and does anyone knows good books about mathematical physics to start with?
Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K