Questions about Significant Figures

In summary: Thanks again!In summary, the concept of significant figures (SigFigs) is used to express uncertainty in a measurement. For a value like 100, there can be one, two, or three significant figures. The assumed uncertainty is usually 1, but can also be 2 or 3. The uncertainty would be plus or minus 10 if only two figures (1 and the middle 0) are significant, and plus or minus 100 if only one figure (1) is significant. It is good practice to keep an extra significant figure or two throughout a calculation and round off only in the final result, also known as "guard digits". This is to avoid losing important information and to maintain accuracy. However, sig fig
  • #1
nlcsa22
2
0
Hi. Sorry that I abandoned the provided template, but it didn't really apply to the questions that I had..these all deal with significant figures:

1. For the number 100, I understand that there can be one, two, or three
significant figures. If there are three, then I understand that the assumed
uncertainty in the measurement (if no uncertainty is explicity stated) is 1 (perhaps even 2 or 3, but usually 1). So
we can then say 100 +/- 1. So the actual measurement could be as low as 99
or as high as 101. What would the uncertainty be if we were to say that only
two of the figures in 100 were significant (ie. the 1 and the middle 0)?
Would it be plus or minus 10 (meaning that the actual measurement would be
between 90 and 110)? And what would the uncertainty be if we were to say
that there was only one significant figure in 100 (ie. the 1)? Would it be plus or minus 100 (meaning that the actual measurement would be between 0
and 200)?

2. My textbook says that "it is good practice to keep an extra significant
figure or two throughout a calculation, and round off only in the final
result." Can you please explain this? An example would be helpful, too.

3. My textbook says that 1 in. = 2.54 cm. It says that this is exact, so the
2.54 has an infinite number of significant figures, not just 3. In an
example in the book, the author uses this conversion factor to convert 1
square inch to square centimeters. He writes 1sq.in. = (2.54cm)^2 =
6.45sq.cm. Now, 2.54*2.54 = 6.4516. Since 2.54 here has an infinite number
of significant figures, the 6.4516 also must have an infinite number of
significant figures. But the author rounded 6.4516 to 6.45. In doing so, was
he "clipping" the significant figures from infinity to 3, or do we still
consider the 6.45 to have an infinite number of significant figures? If the
former is true (ie. he reduced the significant figures from infinity to 3),
why did he do that?

4. One problem in my textbook involves a posted speed limit of 55 mph. Does
this have an infinite number of significant figures, since it's an exact
number?

Thanks very much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
1/ The standard format is: A x 10^B, where A and B are numbers. The digits of A are significant numbers. Here when you write "100", we understand that it is "100 x 10^0". If the value is 100 (unofficially written) and the number of significant figures is 2, then you write "10 x 10^1".
Normally if you write "100" without stating the uncertainty, people will understand that the uncertainty is 1. And for "10 x 10^1", it is "1 x 10^1".
And yep, when you write "1 x 10^2" without saying anything about the uncertainty, people understand it's either that you forget to mention the uncertainty or that this value is very unreliable.

2/ For example: A = B + C. Uncertainty: dA = dB + dC. A is the one we need. Say: dB = 1.5, dC = 1.6.
If we round dB and dC up, what do we have for dA? Otherwise, what is dA? See the difference in the 2 cases? :wink:

3/ I would say the rounding up might be an approximation, which serves for some particular purpose of the author.

4/ I think besides values which are defined (such as c = 29..., or 1 inch = 2.54cm), the rest should be occupied by uncertainties. Then see my answer for question 1 :smile:
 
  • #3
1. I would put the error in your first case as +/-0.5, then +/-5 and +/-50. I don't think notes are always consistent about that, though. Otherwise, you're correct.

2. This is most applicable when you have varying numbers of sig figs. eg:

5.3*2.13546723435 + 6*7.93548
= 11.3179763 + 47.61288
=58.9308563
=59 to sig figs

If we round of to sig figs immediately, we get:
5.3*2.13546723435 + 6*7.93548
=11 + 50
=61

3. Technically, yes, he did clip the number of sig figs. I would guess that he just didn't think it was worth the hassle of carrying four decimal places. If your school's anything like mine, there's one almighty fuss about sig figs up front and then most of the time you don't bother with them as long as you have a reasonable number of places, at least in theory problems.

4. Yes, it has an infinite number of sig figs, but not because it's an exact number (100 in your first question is an exact number). Only measured quantities need sig figs and the speed limit is not a measured quantity. Any other quantity is taken to have an infinite number of sig figs.
 
  • #4
nlcsa22 said:
we can then say 100 +/- 1. So the actual measurement could be as low as 99
or as high as 101. What would the uncertainty be if we were to say that only
two of the figures in 100 were significant (ie. the 1 and the middle 0)?
Would it be plus or minus 10 (meaning that the actual measurement would be
between 90 and 110)? And what would the uncertainty be if we were to say
that there was only one significant figure in 100 (ie. the 1)? Would it be plus or minus 100 (meaning that the actual measurement would be between 0
and 200)?

I would say it is 100±0.5, 100±5, 100±50. But honestly, you should not treat sig figs too seriously. There are much better ways of explicitly expressing uncertainty.

2. My textbook says that "it is good practice to keep an extra significant
figure or two throughout a calculation, and round off only in the final
result." Can you please explain this? An example would be helpful, too.

These are often called "guard digits".
 
  • #5
Thanks to everyone who replied to my questions...all the answers were helpful and I feel like I finally understand the whole concept of SigFigs.
 

1. What are significant figures and why are they important?

Significant figures represent the precision of a measurement or calculation. They are important because they provide a standardized way of reporting the accuracy of data, allowing for proper communication and comparison between scientific results.

2. How do I determine the number of significant figures in a measurement?

The rules for determining significant figures are as follows: 1) All non-zero digits are significant, 2) Zeros between non-zero digits are significant, 3) Leading zeros (zeros before the first non-zero digit) are not significant, and 4) Trailing zeros (zeros after the last non-zero digit) are significant only if there is a decimal point present.

3. Can I round to the same number of significant figures as the least precise measurement in a calculation?

No, when performing calculations with significant figures, you must follow the rules for determining significant figures and round your final answer to the same number of significant figures as the least precise measurement. This ensures that your answer is not reported with more precision than the original data.

4. How do I perform mathematical operations with significant figures?

When performing addition or subtraction, round your answer to the same number of decimal places as the least precise measurement. For multiplication or division, round your answer to the same number of significant figures as the least precise measurement. However, if the answer is a whole number, it should have the same number of significant figures as the original data.

5. Why do we use the term "significant figures" instead of "decimal places"?

Significant figures take into account all digits in a number, including the ones before and after the decimal point. This is important because the number of digits before and after the decimal point can vary, so using the term "decimal places" may not accurately describe the precision of a measurement or calculation.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
758
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
399
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
751
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
934
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
849
Back
Top