Questions about some material from Dirac

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter JasonJo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dirac Material
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies key concepts in quantum mechanics related to Dirac and Schrödinger representations. The standard ket is defined as a vector in Hilbert space, representing a quantum state with a norm of unity, indicating that the wavefunction's amplitude equals 1 across all spatial points. Schrödinger's representation utilizes position and its derivatives to describe physical systems. The coefficient 'i' in the quantum Poisson bracket is confirmed to be the complex unit, and arbitrary phase factors cannot be eliminated unless they are constants.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hilbert space in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with Schrödinger representation and its implications
  • Knowledge of quantum Poisson brackets and their mathematical formulation
  • Basic linear algebra concepts, particularly inner product spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hilbert space and its role in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of Schrödinger representation in quantum systems
  • Learn about the mathematical formulation of quantum Poisson brackets
  • Investigate the significance of phase factors in quantum states
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of Dirac and Schrödinger representations in quantum theory.

JasonJo
Messages
425
Reaction score
2
Hey I was hoping you guys could clarify some stuff in Dirac, I'm trying to sort through the Schrödinger representation:

1) What exactly is the standard ket > ? Can anyone give me it in terms of pure linear algebra? What does it mean for it to be unity in terms of wave functions??

2) I guess Schrödinger's representation allows us to use only position and corresponding position derivatives to describe a physical system?

3) When we have the coefficient i in the equation for the quantum Poisson bracket, is this the complex i? Or is it an arbitrary coefficient.

4) When exactly can't we eliminate arbitrary phase factors? I know when the phase factor is a constant, we can take it such that it is unity when it is multiplied by it's conjugate.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) The standard ket is a vector in Hilbert space that describes the quantum state of a system. In terms of linear algebra, it is a vector in an inner product space, with the inner product being the probability amplitude of the system. It is unity if its norm (the absolute value of its inner product with itself) is equal to 1. This means that the amplitude of the wavefunction is equal to 1 for all points in space.2) Yes, Schrödinger's representation allows us to use only position and corresponding position derivatives to describe a physical system.3) Yes, the coefficient i in the equation for the quantum Poisson bracket is the complex i.4) We can't eliminate arbitrary phase factors when the phase factor is not a constant. In this case, we can only take it such that it is equal to 1 when it is multiplied by its conjugate up to a multiplicative constant.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K