Questions about the Double Slit Experiment

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of observation in the double slit experiment, particularly regarding the interference pattern of particles. It is established that modifying the experiment to record "which way" information alters the interference pattern, regardless of whether anyone observes the data. The interpretations of the double slit experiment, including Copenhagen, Einstein, and Bohmian, emphasize that the availability of which-slit information, rather than the act of observation itself, determines the outcome. The consensus is that the interference pattern is lost when which-slit information is accessible, irrespective of the observer's actions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the double slit experiment
  • Knowledge of quantum interpretations (Copenhagen, Bohmian, etc.)
  • Basic grasp of particle-wave duality
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics
  • Explore Bohmian mechanics and its implications on quantum observation
  • Investigate experimental setups for the double slit experiment
  • Learn about quantum decoherence and its effect on interference patterns
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists exploring interpretations of quantum theory, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of observation in quantum experiments.

andrewshen123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
As I'm not learning quantum mechanics formally in a classroom, I have no real experience with the matter, or a teacher to whom I can pose my questions. There are a few experiments I'd like to run as well, but no way to do so. In any case, I'm hoping that someone else has run these experiments, or at least has theories as to what will happen.

  1. What happens if you run the double slit experiment, recording which particles go through which slit, look at the back wall before looking at the results of the observations, then look back at the wall? Will it start off as an interference pattern, then become a clumping pattern, since your knowledge about the particles has changed? Will it "predict" that you will look at the data, and start off as a clumping pattern? Will the fact that you've already looked at the wall lock the particles in place, so even after you look at the data, their positions won't change because you know where they landed? Or something completely different?
  2. What happens if you run the experiment with two (groups of) people, one to look at the wall and one who may or may not look at the data. Will the results always agree with each other? Does it matter if you look at the wall or the data first, even if it's two different people doing so?

Thank you for reading, and hopefully for responding.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The interference pattern doesn't change just because someone chooses to look or not look at the data about which slit the particles passed through. Modifying the experiment in order to record the "which way" information is what changes the interference pattern--whether or not anyone looks at that information.
 
"double slit experiment" interpretations depend on "school" you are belong to.
There are Copenhagen, Einstein, Bohmian,... or your own.
Physics Forum rules forbid even discussion of the validity of any of them :(((((
So i must close my mouth.
 
Don't all the interpretations agree that, as long as you modify the experiment in such a way that which-slit info is leaked out into the environment, you will not get the interference pattern. Shouldn't matter if or when or who looks at the which slit information, just that the which slit information is available is enough to remove the interference.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
848
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
950
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K