Questions about the Eddington Limit and Super - Eddington black holes

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Cerenkov
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) have identified a significant population of faint, dusty active galactic nuclei at redshift z ≈ 4–7, alongside supermassive black holes at z > 6. The discovery of LID-568, a low-mass black hole (7.2 × 106 M⊙) undergoing super-Eddington accretion, challenges existing theories regarding black hole formation. This black hole is accreting at over 4,000% of the Eddington limit, indicating robust nuclear-driven outflows as evidenced by spatially extended Hα emission. These findings provide essential insights into the mechanisms of rapid black hole growth in the early universe.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Eddington limit in astrophysics
  • Familiarity with black hole formation theories, including light seeds and heavy seeds
  • Knowledge of redshift and its significance in cosmology
  • Experience with JWST observational data and analysis techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of super-Eddington accretion on black hole evolution
  • Study the formation mechanisms of seed black holes from primordial gas clouds
  • Examine the role of active galactic nuclei in cosmic structure formation
  • Learn about JWST's Near-Infrared Spectrograph and its data analysis methods
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students interested in black hole evolution, cosmic structure formation, and the latest findings from the James Webb Space Telescope.

Cerenkov
Messages
358
Reaction score
95
TL;DR
https://noirlab.edu/public/news/noirlab2427/
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-024-02402-9
“A super-Eddington-accreting black hole ~1.5 Gyr after the Big Bang observed with JWST”
Recent James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) observations have revealed a surprisingly abundant population of faint, dusty active galactic nuclei at z ≈ 4–7. Together with the presence of supermassive black holes at z > 6, this raises questions about the formation and growth histories of early black holes. Current theories for the formation of seed black holes from the death of the first stars (that is, light seeds) and/or the direct collapse of primordial gas clouds (that is, heavy seeds) still lack observational confirmation. Here we present LID-568, a low-mass (7.2 × 106 M⊙) black hole hosting powerful outflows that is observed in an extreme phase of rapid growth at redshift z ≈ 4. This object is similar to other JWST-discovered faint active galactic nuclei populations, but is bright in X-ray emission and accreting at more than 4,000% of the limit at which radiation pressure exceeds the force of gravitational attraction of the black hole (that is, super-Eddington accretion). Analysis of JWST Near-Infrared Spectrograph integral field unit data reveals spatially extended Hα emission with velocities of ~−600–−500 km s−1 relative to the central black hole, indicative of robust nuclear-driven outflows. LID-568 represents an elusive low-mass black hole experiencing super-Eddington accretion as invoked by models of early black hole formation. This discovery showcases a previously undiscovered key parameter space and offers crucial insights into rapid black hole growth mechanisms in the early universe.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello.

My interest was piqued by this article and the accompanying Nature Astronomy paper. I have a naïve understanding of the role of the Eddington limit in black hole evolution - but I would like to learn more. I am also intrigued by what this finding means if the Eddington limit can be so strongly exceeded. Any help given would be very much appreciated and would probably lead to further questions in this thread.

Thank you,


Cerenkov
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Drakkith

Similar threads

  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K