Graduate Questions: Gott-Li Can a Universe Create Itself?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AntHak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Gott-Li model of a self-creating universe as proposed in "Can the Universe Create Itself?" (Phys. Rev. D 58, 1998). Key points include the role of closed timelike curves (CTCs) in the model, suggesting that the laws of physics may exist independently of the universe. Participants express confusion about whether the initial CTC represents a creation event or a "brute fact," with consensus leaning towards the absence of a traditional creation event. The conversation highlights the philosophical implications of the model while grounding the discussion in scientific principles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of closed timelike curves (CTCs)
  • Familiarity with general relativity principles
  • Knowledge of the Gott-Li model and its implications
  • Basic grasp of cosmological theories regarding the universe's origins
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of closed timelike curves in general relativity
  • Explore J. Richard Gott's interviews and lectures on self-creating universes
  • Investigate the philosophical aspects of cosmology and the first cause problem
  • Study the concept of emergent laws of physics in cosmological models
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, philosophers of science, and anyone interested in the theoretical foundations of cosmology and the nature of the universe's origins.

AntHak
Messages
2
Reaction score
3
Hello, this is my first post here. I have a couple questions regarding the Gott-Li model of a self creating universe, proposed in "Can the Universe Create Itself?", Phys. Rev. D 58, (1998).
First, I should disclose that I am an amateur and may hold some misconceptions. I tried to keep these questions based in science but, recognize that some may border philosophical, I hope they are valid nonetheless.

1. I was under the impression that the laws of physics would be emergent in this model, but the author's closing statement "Do the laws of physics prevent the Universe from being its own mother?" confuses me. Does this suggest the laws of physics governed the existence of the initial Universe/CTC?

2. If a CTC caused our inflationary Universe/Multiverse, couldn't this have happened more than once (i.e. multiple/infinite CTCs creating their own inflationary multiverses separate from our own)?

3. To what extent is the Universe created from nothing in this model? Would the initial CTC be a "brute fact", or room for "turtles" farther down?

Thank you for any answers!
 
Space news on Phys.org
AntHak said:
1. I was under the impression that the laws of physics would be emergent in this model, but the author's closing statement "Do the laws of physics prevent the Universe from being its own mother?" confuses me. Does this suggest the laws of physics governed the existence of the initial Universe/CTC?
The entire paper is based on the idea of a 'closed timelike curve', which is a particular solution to the equations of general relativity. This would seem to require that the laws of physics, at least for GR, exist outside or separate of the universe in some sense.

AntHak said:
3. To what extent is the Universe created from nothing in this model? Would the initial CTC be a "brute fact", or room for "turtles" farther down?
In my view there doesn't seem to be any creation event in this model. If we follow a worldline through the CTC it simply comes back around to its original starting point. There's no point at which beyond this point the universe doesn't exist.
 
Drakkith said:
The entire paper is based on the idea of a 'closed timelike curve', which is a particular solution to the equations of general relativity. This would seem to require that the laws of physics, at least for GR, exist outside or separate of the universe in some sense.In my view there doesn't seem to be any creation event in this model. If we follow a worldline through the CTC it simply comes back around to its original starting point. There's no point at which beyond this point the universe doesn't exist.
Thanks for explaining Drakkith!

J. Richard Gott also has a few interviews and lectures explaining further available on YouTube; I believe he said a CTC could explain the first cause problem (the Universe essentially caused itself). However, I agree with your interpretation, I don't see any creation event in this model.
 
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K