A Questions: Gott-Li Can a Universe Create Itself?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter AntHak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Gott-Li model of a self-creating universe, raising questions about the nature of laws of physics and the concept of closed timelike curves (CTCs). Participants express confusion over whether the laws of physics are emergent or pre-existing, particularly in relation to the initial universe and CTCs. The model suggests that there may not be a definitive creation event, as a worldline through a CTC returns to its starting point without a clear origin. Additionally, the possibility of multiple CTCs creating separate inflationary multiverses is considered. Overall, the conversation explores the implications of CTCs on the understanding of the universe's existence and origins.
AntHak
Messages
2
Reaction score
3
Hello, this is my first post here. I have a couple questions regarding the Gott-Li model of a self creating universe, proposed in "Can the Universe Create Itself?", Phys. Rev. D 58, (1998).
First, I should disclose that I am an amateur and may hold some misconceptions. I tried to keep these questions based in science but, recognize that some may border philosophical, I hope they are valid nonetheless.

1. I was under the impression that the laws of physics would be emergent in this model, but the author's closing statement "Do the laws of physics prevent the Universe from being its own mother?" confuses me. Does this suggest the laws of physics governed the existence of the initial Universe/CTC?

2. If a CTC caused our inflationary Universe/Multiverse, couldn't this have happened more than once (i.e. multiple/infinite CTCs creating their own inflationary multiverses separate from our own)?

3. To what extent is the Universe created from nothing in this model? Would the initial CTC be a "brute fact", or room for "turtles" farther down?

Thank you for any answers!
 
Space news on Phys.org
AntHak said:
1. I was under the impression that the laws of physics would be emergent in this model, but the author's closing statement "Do the laws of physics prevent the Universe from being its own mother?" confuses me. Does this suggest the laws of physics governed the existence of the initial Universe/CTC?
The entire paper is based on the idea of a 'closed timelike curve', which is a particular solution to the equations of general relativity. This would seem to require that the laws of physics, at least for GR, exist outside or separate of the universe in some sense.

AntHak said:
3. To what extent is the Universe created from nothing in this model? Would the initial CTC be a "brute fact", or room for "turtles" farther down?
In my view there doesn't seem to be any creation event in this model. If we follow a worldline through the CTC it simply comes back around to its original starting point. There's no point at which beyond this point the universe doesn't exist.
 
Drakkith said:
The entire paper is based on the idea of a 'closed timelike curve', which is a particular solution to the equations of general relativity. This would seem to require that the laws of physics, at least for GR, exist outside or separate of the universe in some sense.In my view there doesn't seem to be any creation event in this model. If we follow a worldline through the CTC it simply comes back around to its original starting point. There's no point at which beyond this point the universe doesn't exist.
Thanks for explaining Drakkith!

J. Richard Gott also has a few interviews and lectures explaining further available on YouTube; I believe he said a CTC could explain the first cause problem (the Universe essentially caused itself). However, I agree with your interpretation, I don't see any creation event in this model.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top