Questions on the consequence of an evolving dark energy parameter

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent DESI 3-year study results indicate that dark energy evolves over time, specifically decreasing over the last 11 billion years, corroborated by findings from the DES collaboration. This 3-sigma significant result suggests that the weakening of dark energy is a genuine phenomenon rather than a statistical anomaly. The discussion raises critical questions regarding the implications of a vanishing dark energy parameter on cosmological models, including inflation and holographic theories, as well as the potential for altering fundamental laws of physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of dark energy and its role in cosmology
  • Familiarity with the concepts of cosmological inflation and holographic models
  • Knowledge of Swampland conjectures and their implications in theoretical physics
  • Basic grasp of statistical significance in scientific research
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of dark energy evolution on cosmological inflation models
  • Explore the holographic principle and its relationship with dark energy
  • Investigate the Swampland conjecture and its relevance to dark energy and cosmological constants
  • Examine recent studies on the effects of changing dark energy on fundamental physics laws
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, theoretical physicists, cosmologists, and researchers interested in the implications of dark energy on the universe's evolution and fundamental laws of physics.

Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR
Questions after DESI 3 year data strengthens evidence in favour of an evolving dark energy parameter?
So DESI 3 year study results were revealed and when combined with other data from other sources it revealed a 3-sigma significant results that dark energy evolves with time, more specifically that it has been decreasing in the last 11 billion years or so (https://newscenter.lbl.gov/2025/03/19/new-desi-results-strengthen-hints-that-dark-energy-may-evolve/)

Another collaboration, DES, has released recently another study with lots of data also consistent with an evolving dark energy, indicating as well that it is getting weaker over time (https://www.quantamagazine.org/is-d...r-new-evidence-strengthens-the-case-20250319/)

So it seems that dark energy getting weaker is most likely a real thing and not a statistical fluctuation. I had several questions about these findings:

1. I've looked into some of the results and apparently they measured that dark energy grew stronger for some time just after the Big Bang and then it got weaker for the last 11 billion years. But it is not clear to me whether they measured a constant weakening of dark energy or whether dark energy decreasing rate has getting smaller over time, so that it seems that it would stabilize into a zero value or if it looks like it is going to vanish completely reaching 0. Does anyone know? Also, is it possible that dark energy may get negative (like in AdS)? Or even get stronger again (meaning behaving like a phantom dark energy parameter)?

2. Assuming that dark energy will vanish to zero, how are cosmological inflation and holographic models affected by this? Especially for holographic models, since our universe would not be approximating a dS spacetime, but seemingly a Minkowski one? Does this invalidate holography in theoretical physics?

3. If dark energy was to disappear, would this paper (https://arxiv.org/abs/1002.4278), which relies on applying the holographic principle and entropy to the cosmological horizon created by a cosmological constant, would be falsified?

4. A decreasing dark energy parameter gives support to Swampland models from Cumrun Vafa and others (https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0509212), which had some problems with universes having a cosmological constant. However, even if the Swampland conjecture is correct, and universes with a cosmological constant are inconsistent with quantum gravity, since apparenly dark energy got stronger in the past, would it mean that universes in the "swampland" could actually exist but in a metastable form before reaching a stable state (like one without any cosmological cosntant)?

5. In this article (https://www.quantamagazine.org/wani...e-swampland-of-impossible-universes-20240819/) it is explained at the end that if dark energy decreased it could change the laws of physics, quoting it

"Perhaps dark energy will fall until it settles into a stabler, possibly negative value. With that, a new universe, with new laws, particles and forces, would replace the current one."

However, how can an evolving dark energy parameter change the laws of physics of the universe? What laws could change? Even the most fundamental ones?

I'm aware that most of the answers to these questions are temptative and it's too soon to ask them (and probably they will never be answered), but I would be rather asking what are the most likely possible answers with what we have now. If they are completely useless and meaningless questions please feel free to close the post.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Suekdccia said:
I had several questions about these findings
These findings don't answer any of your questions. They can't. Your questions are about hypothetical models, none of which these findings test.

Suekdccia said:
I would be rather asking what are the most likely possible answers with what we have now.
There's no way to answer this.

Suekdccia said:
If they are completely useless and meaningless questions please feel free to close the post.
Done.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K