Programs Questions Regarding Undergrad REU Programs

AI Thread Summary
Undergraduate students seeking Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REUs) should prioritize finding programs that align with their interests, particularly in astrophysics, while considering remote options due to personal circumstances. Many REUs require on-site participation, and financial aid may cover travel and housing costs. Crafting a standout application involves showcasing relevant skills and experiences, such as programming or prior projects, and demonstrating genuine interest in the research. Networking with professors and reaching out to organizations without formal REUs can also open opportunities for engagement. Focusing on skill development and learning about the research process is essential, as publications may not be guaranteed but can enhance academic profiles.
Ascendant0
Messages
175
Reaction score
38
I'm in my 3rd year of undergrad currently, and trying to find an REU program to get into. This is my first time doing this, so I'm not sure the best approach?

My college's physics society gave us a link to a REU site here: https://new.nsf.gov/funding/initiat...y=astrophysics&sort=search_api_relevance_DESC

It seems like there are a ton just on that site alone, but a few of the things I don't know about as far as applying for REUs:

1a) First and foremost, being a parent with shared custody of my children, I really don't want to leave them if I'm able to do something remotely from my home. How likely/unlikely are these REU programs to allow remote work?

1b) (if applicable) If the majority will require me to be there at their location, is the travel and housing to travel and stay there something financial aid can help cover?

2) I see from that site each one has their own application instructions, but I wanted to ask above and beyond filling out the application, what is suggested as far as a REU request/proposal? What really tends to get you to stand out (other than pointing out that you've done your research into exactly what they do there, and why it appeals to you)?

3) Is it feasible to reach out to specific organizations I might be interested in that don't openly offer REUs and see if I can get engaged with them in some way? If so, tying into 2, for those that don't currently have REUs, what would you suggest as far as an optimal approach?

4) I know ideally for grad school, you want to be in some kind of published research as an undergraduate. Is there anything in particular to do in order to try and make that happen for yourself, or is that something that most REUs would offer as a part of the REU itself?

Any other advice, suggestions, etc. that you have that you feel would help would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't speak much toward the formal US REU program itself however...

Ascendant0 said:
3) Is it feasible to reach out to specific organizations I might be interested in that don't openly offer REUs and see if I can get engaged with them in some way? If so, tying into 2, for those that don't currently have REUs, what would you suggest as far as an optimal approach?
Absolutely.
Most students will stary by asking their professors if they know of any opportunities to get involved in research. Not all professors will have such opportunities, but many will know of someone who does, or who has taken on undergraduate students in the past. Then it's a matter of emailing and following up.

Ascendant0 said:
4) I know ideally for grad school, you want to be in some kind of published research as an undergraduate. Is there anything in particular to do in order to try and make that happen for yourself, or is that something that most REUs would offer as a part of the REU itself?
I wouldn't focus too much on publications. While a publication is tangible evidence of academic productivity if you can get one, there are often factors well out of your control. Usually it's best to focus on skill development, exploring the subfield you end up working in, and learn as much as you can about the process of doing research itself. If you end up with a publication as an undergrad, that's great. But you can also look for opportunities to present the work (or your contribution to it) at conferences, or even at events within the university itself. While a conference abstract doesn't carry the same weight as a peer-reviewed paper, it's something, and you might have more control over producing it. Other things you can put together include procedures, instruction manuals, internal reports, and commissioning documents. Sometimes as an undergraduate researcher your contribution is simply proving that a new device works as advertised, and while that may not lead to an immediate paper, it can provide the basis for work down the road.

Ascendant0 said:
2) I see from that site each one has their own application instructions, but I wanted to ask above and beyond filling out the application, what is suggested as far as a REU request/proposal? What really tends to get you to stand out (other than pointing out that you've done your research into exactly what they do there, and why it appeals to you)?
Put together your CV and figure out what skills you can bring to the table. Do you have any programming experience? What kinds of big projects have you been involved with so far in your courses? Are there any extra-curricular activities that might relate to the work? Hobbies?
When you speak with your professors, it's okay to ask them direction what they're looking for when they hire undergraduates.
 
Contact the university, sire. But don't be a pest. Don't asl what's a;ready on the web site. Don;t ask for advice on every single line in the applicayion. Don't ask them "chance me". Every year there is one. I have never seen them selected.

Your message nakes you look like a "box checker" - you dsplayed no interest in the reseach itself or what you might learn, You present as someone who wants to beef up their grad apps. This dpes not go over well.

Remote REUs were tried dueing covic. I think its fair to say the results were unsatisfctory.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Ascendant0, Tom.G and PhDeezNutz
Choppy said:
I can't speak much toward the formal US REU program itself however...


Absolutely.
Most students will stary by asking their professors if they know of any opportunities to get involved in research. Not all professors will have such opportunities, but many will know of someone who does, or who has taken on undergraduate students in the past. Then it's a matter of emailing and following up.


I wouldn't focus too much on publications. While a publication is tangible evidence of academic productivity if you can get one, there are often factors well out of your control. Usually it's best to focus on skill development, exploring the subfield you end up working in, and learn as much as you can about the process of doing research itself. If you end up with a publication as an undergrad, that's great. But you can also look for opportunities to present the work (or your contribution to it) at conferences, or even at events within the university itself. While a conference abstract doesn't carry the same weight as a peer-reviewed paper, it's something, and you might have more control over producing it. Other things you can put together include procedures, instruction manuals, internal reports, and commissioning documents. Sometimes as an undergraduate researcher your contribution is simply proving that a new device works as advertised, and while that may not lead to an immediate paper, it can provide the basis for work down the road.


Put together your CV and figure out what skills you can bring to the table. Do you have any programming experience? What kinds of big projects have you been involved with so far in your courses? Are there any extra-curricular activities that might relate to the work? Hobbies?
When you speak with your professors, it's okay to ask them direction what they're looking for when they hire undergraduates.
Thank you for all the information. I don't have time to give a thorough response right now, as class is about to start, but real quick:

I do have C++ experience, but it's been years. I need to brush up and plan to after our exams that finish up next week.

My college actually has a requirement for undergrads to do a summer research project on the summer of your 3rd year that is a sort of course for the college. However, none of the professors are doing any research I'm particularly interested in at this time (mostly astrophysics and astroparticle physics - dark energy, dark matter, black holes, etc.). That's why I'm looking for something additional outside of my college.

I need to update and tweak my CV, but fortunately, my college has a career center that assists with that. Another thing I plan to do after these ongoing exams.

I had done a lot of things when I was in college prior to this (coming back after an 8yr hiatus). I started at a state college, which had no physics internships. So, I created my own by coordinating with the nuclear medicine department of the local hospital. I developed an internship program for future students, but that was just the best I could find at the time. It's not what I want to actually pursue down the road.

I did a ton of other things, but like I said, very limited on time at this point with exams going on. I greatly appreciate the feedback and suggestions you gave
 
Reach out to the physics chair/undergrad advisor. Also, check out the physics department online website.

Do you belong to a minority group?
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
I have a specialization in condensed matter physics and materials physics, and off-late, I have been seeing a lot of research directions moving towards quantum computing (AMO and non-linear optics) and the huge chunk of quantum materials research (and funding) is dedicated towards QIS and QC research. I am wondering (sort of in a dilemma), if I should consider switching my field? I am currently at the stage of a postdoc.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top