Help with Physics REU List for Sophomore Female Student

  • Context: Programs 
  • Thread starter Thread starter burntclaw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    List Reu
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a sophomore female student seeking advice on her list of physics Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REUs) for the summer. Participants provide feedback on the feasibility of her list, the application process, and the importance of tailored recommendation letters.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern that applying to twelve REUs may be excessive and question the feasibility of obtaining sufficient tailored letters of recommendation.
  • Others suggest that focusing on a smaller number of applications may allow for higher quality submissions and more targeted recommendation letters.
  • The original poster indicates a strong interest in computational physics and mentions specific programs that align with this interest, particularly UMD TREND and LSU Computational.
  • There is a discussion about the potential for remote research opportunities due to COVID-19, with the original poster expressing comfort with this format.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of tailoring recommendation letters to specific opportunities to enhance their impact.
  • The original poster acknowledges the advice received and mentions having narrowed her list to eight programs after considering the feedback.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of quality over quantity in applications, but there is no consensus on the optimal number of REUs to apply to or the best approach for recommendation letters.

Contextual Notes

Some participants raise concerns about the time and effort required to research each opportunity and the implications of asking professors for multiple letters of recommendation. The discussion reflects varying opinions on the balance between applying to many programs versus focusing on fewer, more targeted applications.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering applying to REUs, particularly those in physics or related fields, may find the insights on application strategies and recommendation letters beneficial.

burntclaw
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Whoever's reading this, I hope you are well! I'm applying to 12 different physics REUs for the summer and only recently became aware of how competitive they were. I was wondering if anyone would be willing to help me with my current REU list– is the list too unrealistic? Are there other places you would recommend? Any general advice with REU apps would be appreciated.

My current list is REUs at LSU, U Rochester, UMD TREND, UC Davis, NIST SURF, UChicago, BYU, Oklahoma State, LSU computational, UIUC, and Lehigh.

For reference, I'm a sophomore, female, physics/cs major at a small liberal arts college. I have a 4.0 GPA and some research experience.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Twelve programs seems like a lot to me. Though I'm not too familiar with the specifics of REU programs and I can appreciate trying to play the numbers game. But don't you typically require some letters of reference for them? Are you going to ask a professor to write you twelve letters of reference? How much time and effort are you putting into investigating each opportunity?

You've listed them by location - but what will you be doing at each potential placement? How are the programs changed from recent years with social distancing restrictions? What fields would you like to be doing research in? What skills would you like to get out of such an experience? What are your plans for graduate school?

I guess the point is that before shot-gunning the process and handing in a lot of mediocre applications, it can help to really learn about each opportunity and when the best fit is likely to be. And perhaps develop a sense of what your personal goals are. You might find for example, that a summer job working for a local professor at your own school will outweigh any experience you might gain by the formal REUs.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and burntclaw
Choppy said:
Twelve programs seems like a lot to me. Though I'm not too familiar with the specifics of REU programs and I can appreciate trying to play the numbers game. But don't you typically require some letters of reference for them? Are you going to ask a professor to write you twelve letters of reference? How much time and effort are you putting into investigating each opportunity?

You've listed them by location - but what will you be doing at each potential placement? How are the programs changed from recent years with social distancing restrictions? What fields would you like to be doing research in? What skills would you like to get out of such an experience? What are your plans for graduate school?

I guess the point is that before shot-gunning the process and handing in a lot of mediocre applications, it can help to really learn about each opportunity and when the best fit is likely to be. And perhaps develop a sense of what your personal goals are. You might find for example, that a summer job working for a local professor at your own school will outweigh any experience you might gain by the formal REUs.

Thanks for the reply! I'm currently extremely interested in doing computational physics research and going to grad school in the future. The schools I've listed have computational physics projects offerings, which is why I'm applying. I'm particularly interested in UMD TREND and LSU Computational because of this. However, I fully admit I am also shotgunning a little with the numbers. As for programs being virtual due to COVID, I don't mind doing remote research, as the research area I'm interested in can be done remotely without any problems.

I was worried about annoying my letter of rec writers with 12 applications, but my impression is that they only need to write 1 and then send it out to 12 instead of writing 12 separate ones. What are your thoughts on that? Is that still a bad thing to ask a professor to do? Thanks in advance.
 
As hinted above, I usually recommend students focus on a high level of quality in their applications for a smaller number of opportunities. This allows the student to better target their essays and application materials to each opportunity and also allows recommendation writers to target their recommendations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: burntclaw
burntclaw said:
I was worried about annoying my letter of rec writers with 12 applications, but my impression is that they only need to write 1 and then send it out to 12 instead of writing 12 separate ones. What are your thoughts on that? Is that still a bad thing to ask a professor to do? Thanks in advance.

Asking for 12 letters tends to motivate recommenders to send out the same letter. My preferred approach as a recommender is to tailor each letter of recommendation to the specific opportunity. I both take care to name the specific opportunity in my recommendation letters as well as highlight how the student's skills and strengths are a good match for the specific program to which they are applying. I write different things in support of an application for a computational opportunity than I would for an experimental opportunity. Even for different experimental opportunities, I like to focus on the student strengths that are the best match (assuming I know the student well enough to have choices here.) The less specific a letter of recommendation becomes, the less powerful it's impact is likely to be for the student.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and burntclaw
Dr. Courtney said:
Asking for 12 letters tends to motivate recommenders to send out the same letter. My preferred approach as a recommender is to tailor each letter of recommendation to the specific opportunity. I both take care to name the specific opportunity in my recommendation letters as well as highlight how the student's skills and strengths are a good match for the specific program to which they are applying. I write different things in support of an application for a computational opportunity than I would for an experimental opportunity. Even for different experimental opportunities, I like to focus on the student strengths that are the best match (assuming I know the student well enough to have choices here.) The less specific a letter of recommendation becomes, the less powerful it's impact is likely to be for the student.

That makes a lot of sense. I'll keep that in mind in the future when I apply to programs. For this time around, unfortunately I already asked for the recommendations, so I can only delete programs where the professors haven't send the letters of recs to yet (I think...? I'm scared of asking them again about it haha). I've narrowed down my list to 8 currently.

Thank you so much for your insight, I haven't thought about the points you brought up before!
 
Welcome to PhysicsForums. :smile:
burntclaw said:
For reference, I'm a sophomore, female, physics/cs major at a small liberal arts college. I have a 4.0 GPA and some research experience.
Congrats on the strong GPA!
burntclaw said:
UC Davis
My alma matter. It looks like they are shooting for in-person REUs this summer, assuming that vaccinations go well. Do you have a bicycle that you can take with you? The campus is closed to cars, and everybody gets around on bicycles... :smile:

https://london.physics.ucdavis.edu/~reu/reu.html

1611433759057.png
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Dr. Courtney

Similar threads

  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
14K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K