MHB Questions regarding writing equations when given graphs

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikea2424
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphs Writing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving equations for rational functions based on given graphs. The first graph indicates a single zero at x=1, a y-intercept at (0,-1), and vertical asymptotes at x=±2, leading to the function f(x)=a(x-1)/(b(x+2)(x-2)^2). The second graph has a zero at x=1 with even multiplicity, vertical asymptotes at x=±3, and requires determining the horizontal asymptote and the correct squaring of factors in the denominator. The final function derived for the second graph is f(x)=-54(x-1)^2/(5(x+3)(x-3)^2), with constants a and b adjusted based on intercepts. Understanding the behavior near vertical asymptotes and the degrees of the numerator and denominator is crucial for these equations.
mikea2424
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm studying for a test this Friday and I have two problems that have completely stumped me. I'm not sure how to solve either. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

View attachment 7234

View attachment 7235
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    6.7 KB · Views: 121
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    7.3 KB · Views: 115
Mathematics news on Phys.org
http://mathhelpboards.com/attachments/pre-calculus-21/7234d1503462274-questions-regarding-writing-equations-when-given-graphs-1-jpg

you should know these are both rational functions ... I leave the second graph for you to try.

for the first graph ...
(1) single zero at $x=1$
(2) y-intercept at $(0,-1)$
(3) horizontal asymptote appears to be $y=0$
(4) vertical asymptotes at $x=\pm2$, with the graph $\to +\infty$ for asymptote at $x=2$

$f(x)=\dfrac{a(x-1)}{b(x+2)(x-2)^2}$, where $a$ and $b$ are constants

$f(0)=-1=-\dfrac{a}{8b} \implies a=8b$. To fix $a$ and $b$ requires another point on the graph. I'm not going to try and eyeball another point, so to keep it simple, let $b=1$ ...
 
Thank you very much for replying to my original post.
View attachment 7238

I know that there is a zero at x=1. I know this zero touches the x-axis meaning that it is an even multiplicity. So the top of the fraction should look like (x-1)^2. The vertical asymptotes are x= \pm3. So the bottom of the fraction looks like (x+3)(x-3). This is where I get confused..visibly I can't tell what the horizontal asymptote is. I also am unsure which of the bottom factors I am to square, if any at all. From my notes I can gather that if the parabola goes downward as well as the curves then I am to square one of the factors on the bottom. I have tried squaring each, one at a time and input my equation into Desmos with no luck. As of right now all I know for sure is:

a((x-1)^2)/((x+3)(x-3))
 

Attachments

  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    7.3 KB · Views: 108
The fact there is a horizontal asymptote tells you (numerator degree) < (denominator degree)

As of right now all I know for sure is:

a((x-1)^2)/((x+3)(x-3))

note the function's behavior near the vertical asymptote $x = 3$ indicates the value $(x-3)$ in the denominator is squared ,,,

$f(x) = \dfrac{a(x-1)^2}{b(x+3)(x-3)^2}$

$f(0) = -0.4 \implies \dfrac{a}{27b} = -\dfrac{2}{5} \implies b = -\dfrac{5a}{54}$

once again, not having a second point on the curve other than an x or y intercept ...

let $a = 1 \implies b = -\dfrac{5}{54}$ ...

$f(x) = -\dfrac{54(x-1)^2}{5(x+3)(x-3)^2}$
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top