Questoins about quad SLI/CrossfireX

  • Thread starter Thread starter SootAndGrime
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the practicality of using four graphics cards in a system, particularly in SLI or Crossfire configurations. Users report that two high-performance dual-core GPUs, such as the ATI Radeon HD 6990 or NVIDIA GTX 590, are often sufficient for most gaming needs, providing better efficiency and lower heat output compared to four individual cards. The conversation highlights significant issues with power consumption, heat generation, and diminishing returns on performance when exceeding two GPUs. It concludes that for the majority of applications, two GPUs are optimal, with four cards only beneficial in extreme scenarios like high-resolution gaming with multiple monitors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of SLI (Scalable Link Interface) and Crossfire technologies
  • Knowledge of power supply requirements for high-performance GPUs
  • Familiarity with thermal management in multi-GPU setups
  • Awareness of performance scaling in multi-GPU configurations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the power requirements and thermal management for multi-GPU systems
  • Learn about the performance differences between dual-core GPUs and single-core GPUs
  • Investigate the impact of multi-GPU setups on gaming performance in various resolutions
  • Explore the limitations of SLI and Crossfire in modern gaming applications
USEFUL FOR

Gamers, PC builders, hardware enthusiasts, and system architects looking to optimize graphics performance and power efficiency in high-end gaming setups.

SootAndGrime
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
I have two enthusiast-level ATI Radeon cards in crossfire and I don't understand the necessity of having more than two graphics cards in a system. I can run just about any game maxed out with playable framerates, even Crysis.

There are many inherent problems with having four graphics cards. With heat and staggering power consumption being the most prominent. Four-way HD 6970 or GTX 580's can use 1,400W+ of total system power at full load. The only PSU that I know of capable of powering four GPU's at full-bore (tested) is the Silverstone 1,500W. Also, your typical power socket cannot handle the load and circuit breakers can blow. Requiring an electrician to repair.

Don't forget the chip-melting heat four graphics cards can produce. And since they are right next to each other, they share the heat. This can cause some of the cards to exceed 90 *C in some cases.

Who would actually need four graphics cards in SLI/CF? It's much better to have two dual-core GPU's like two HD 6990's or two GTX 590's instead of having four individual graphics cards. While sacrificing a small amount of performance due to the cards being downclocked. Also, you'll be saving PCIe slots.

It's hard to overclock the dual-core GPU's to match the clock speeds of their single core counterparts. The cards are downclocked for heat/power reasons.

Off-topic, but why is it that no single graphics card is allowed to exceed 400W?

Two or three is more than enough for 99% of applications. Also, the performance scaling after two GPU's isn't very good. A third card might add 40% more performance, while a fourth will give only about 25%.

Trying to run Crysis on 2560x1600 with 32xMSAA with graphics mods installed and on multiple monitors might need four GPU's. But I can't think of anything else.

Does anyone here have four graphics cards in their system? If so, can you give me some input?

4waysligtx480-sg.jpg
 
Last edited:
Computer science news on Phys.org
Why not two HD6990 cards, since each of those cards has 2 GPUs?
 
rcgldr said:
Why not two HD6990 cards, since each of those cards has 2 GPUs?

Someone said that if you only have one monitor, then four GPU's actually hurts performance.
 
I think there's a few professional flight simulators which use multiple graphics cards to spread out the images in wrap-around for the pilots.

http://digitaledgepc.com/" ? perhaps a regular card can do three monitors. Don't know for sure, but I think two's the limit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Flight simualtor X "FSX" only benefits to a certain extent when it comes to graphics adapter performance.

The rest comes from the system processor.

That said, processor performance graphs are misleading because you will see a six core processor show higher numbers than a blazingly fast two core processor that outperforms the six core processor by a huge margin while in game/sim.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K