Quick convergent series question.

  • Thread starter Thread starter binbagsss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergent Series
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the convergence of the series defined by 2^n + n!/4^n. It is established that the term n!/4^n diverges as n approaches infinity, while the term 2^n/4^n converges. Despite one part converging, the overall series diverges due to the divergence of n!/4^n, as confirmed by the comparison test. The conclusion is that if any part of a series diverges, the entire series must also diverge.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series convergence and divergence
  • Familiarity with the ratio test for series
  • Knowledge of factorial growth rates compared to exponential functions
  • Basic principles of limits in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the comparison test for series convergence
  • Learn about the ratio test in detail, including examples
  • Explore the behavior of factorial functions versus exponential functions
  • Investigate the implications of divergent series in mathematical analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus or real analysis, and anyone interested in understanding series convergence and divergence principles.

binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12
2^n + n!/4^n ?
so by the 'vanishing condition' as n!/4^n does not ---> 0 as n --> infinity, this part of the series diverges.
however (e.g via the ratio test 2^n/4^n converges).
My book concludes that due to part a, the entire series divegres. However I am struggling to see how this justifies that the whole series will diverge - I thought that if part of a series diverges and part diverges , than what the whole series does depends upon the exact convergence and divergence - i.e could diverge or converge?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The whole series will diverge by comparison

n!/4^n<(2^n + n!)/4^n

If the parts were of opposite sign there would be the possibility of convergence.
 
binbagsss said:
2^n + n!/4^n ?
so by the 'vanishing condition' as n!/4^n does not ---> 0 as n --> infinity, this part of the series diverges.
however (e.g via the ratio test 2^n/4^n converges).
My book concludes that due to part a, the entire series divegres. However I am struggling to see how this justifies that the whole series will diverge - I thought that if part of a series diverges and part diverges , than what the whole series does depends upon the exact convergence and divergence - i.e could diverge or converge?

Looking at what you wrote, which is
2^n + \frac{n!}{4^n},
we have, of course, that both parts diverge. However, assuming you meant
\frac{2^n + n!}{4^n},
which, for some reason you did not want to write as (2^n + n!)/4^n, then you are correct: one "part" converges and the other diverges. However, that *automatically* means that the total diverges. Suppose we have two parts are ##t_1(n)## and ##t_2(n)## and that##\sum t_1(n)## converges while ##\sum t_2(n)## diverges. We have, for finite N:
S(N) = \sum_{n=1}^N (t_1(n) + t_2(n)) = S_1(N) + S_2(N), where the ##S_i(N)## are the partial sums, and our assumptions are that
\lim_{N \to \infty} S_1(N) = s_1 exists and is finite, while
\lim_{N \to \infty} S_2(N) does not exist (that is, it is either ##\pm \infty## or else does not exist at all, due to oscillations, etc). These two statements imply that S(N) does not have a finite limit as N → ∞, so the total series diverges.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K