Solve Math Problem: When Will PEI Population Surpass Newfoundland?

  • Thread starter Thread starter joejo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The population of Prince Edward Island (PEI) will surpass that of Newfoundland and Labrador in the year 2170. The calculations were based on the initial populations of 138,500 for PEI and 533,800 for Newfoundland in 2001, with growth rates of 0.2% and a decline of 0.6% per year, respectively. Using logarithmic equations, the population growth was modeled, leading to the conclusion that PEI's population will exceed Newfoundland's after approximately 169 years from 2001. This results in the crossover year being 2170.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of exponential growth and decay models
  • Familiarity with logarithmic functions and their applications
  • Basic knowledge of population dynamics
  • Ability to solve equations involving natural logarithms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study exponential growth and decay in population models
  • Learn how to solve equations using natural logarithms
  • Explore differential equations related to population dynamics
  • Practice graphing exponential functions to visualize population changes
USEFUL FOR

High school students studying mathematics, educators teaching population dynamics, and anyone interested in demographic trends and mathematical modeling.

joejo
Messages
150
Reaction score
0
Hi guys...can someone help me out with this problem...

The population of Newfoundland and Labrador was 533,800 in 2001. At that time the population of Newfoundland was decreasing at a rate of 0.6% per year. The population of PEI was 138,500 in 2001. At that time the population was increasing at a rate of 0.2% per year. In what year will the population of PEI be more than Newfoundland? Explain?


I have this so far: y=#of years

533,800(1-0.006)^y

138,500(1-0.002)^y


Now what?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the equation of pop. growth is y(t) = y0 * e ^(kt)

where y0 is beginning pop
k is the growth rate
and t is the time

plug in the values and make them equal to each other and solve for t
 
we haven't done that yet..any other way...
 
138,500*(1+0.002)^y = 533,800*(1-0.006)^y
138,500*(1.002)^y = 533,800*(0.994)^y
ln(138,500*(1.002)^y) = ln(533,800*(0.994)^y)
ln(138,500) + ln((1.002)^y) = ln(533,800) + ln((0.994)^y)
ln(138,500) + y*ln(1.002) = ln(533,800) + y*ln(0.994)
y*ln(1.002) - y*ln(0.994) = ln(533,800) - ln(138,500)
y = ln(533,800/138,500) / ln(1.002/0.994) = 168.3

2001 + 168.3 = 2169.3

... theoretical
 
Thx faruk but wats ln?
 
Natural log
 
i haven't done logs yet...this is suppose to be grade 11 math...
 
Last edited:
It's been many years since I've done stuff like this but isn't it the same sort of calculation as working out compound interests?

Create a graph with the decreasing population of Newfoundland represented using one colour and then do the same for Labrador. Where the line cross is where they equal each other.
 
joejo said:
i haven't done logs yet...this is suppose to be grade 11 math...

*joejo, logarithms are used to find exponents, which would be the years in your problem. For example, solving for c in the equation
a = b^c ,\left( {a,b,c} \right) \in \mathbb{R}
will give you
c = \log _b a \Leftrightarrow \frac{{\log a}}{{\log b}} \Leftrightarrow \frac{{\ln a}}{{\ln b}}
*What's left is just plugging in values (*hint:smile:*)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
*P.S., I am a high school junior too (Grade 11), and the mathematics
at my school can seem at times quite slow as well :shy:;
\downarrow For example, I just finished second-semester calculus this year, but I
could have studied it as a sophomore last year (i.e., in 10th grade :rolleyes:~)
 
Last edited:
  • #10
11th grade: that's 16yrs old? Is that the equivalent of O levels (GCSE's)
 
  • #11
Daminc said:
Is that the equivalent of O levels (GCSE's)

No-one calls them O Levels any more :smile:. Edit: A Levels still remain A Levels, though!
 
  • #12
You can also do it by the trial and error method

For Newfoundland : 533800*(1-0.006)^t => 533800*(0.994)^t
For PEI: 138500*(1+0.002)^t => 138500*(1.002)^t

Start with t+0 (t equals the number of years elapsed) and start jumping:

when t=20 Newfoundland=476123.8 & PEI=143858.8 which is no good

t=120 gives Newfoundland=259265.5 & PEI=176025.8 which is closer

t=150 gives Newfoundland=216439.4 & PEI=186899.4 which is closer still

t=170 gives Newfoundland=191895.1 & PEI=194519.2 has overshot a little

t=168 gives Newfoundland=194218.7 & PEI=193743.4 nearly there

t=169 gives Newfoundland=193053.4 & PEI=194130.9 which is the number you want

2001+169=2170 which is the year PEI overtakes Newfoundland :)
 
  • #13
No-one calls them O Levels any more

Hah, I'm old. Leave me alone :cry:

t=169 gives Newfoundland=193053.4 & PEI=194130.9 which is the number you want

2001+169=2170 which is the year PEI overtakes Newfoundland :)

Mmmm, the crossover occurs in the later part of 168 so the year would be 2169 (I think)
 
Last edited:
  • #14
joejo said:
i haven't done logs yet...this is suppose to be grade 11 math...
I would think they would have at least introduced common logs (base 10). Or maybe I'm old, too. When I was in high school, you had to have some understanding of logs or you wouldn't understand your calculator. But then, our calculators were three pieces of bamboo lashed together.
 
  • #15
Actually, in Belgium logs are introduced in grade 12, but that may not be a great reference... :rolleyes:
 
  • #16
thanks guys...you all helped out a bit...Damincs answer was the way we did it in the book...Thanks Daminc!
 
  • #17
This is what I have JoeJo:

Consider differential equations for both places:

\frac{dN}{dt}=-0.006N

\frac{dP}{dt}=0.002P

Solving them with the initial conditions given and equating them for when the populations just become equal we get:

533800e^{-0.006t}=138500e^{-0.002t}

little of this, little of that, we get t=169 so in 2170 the populations become equal as PEI starts to overtake the other one.

Edit: I'm such a slow-poke.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
I would think they would have at least introduced common logs (base 10). Or maybe I'm old, too. When I was in high school, you had to have some understanding of logs or you wouldn't understand your calculator.
When I was younger I think we were introduced to logs by having a small blue book filled with numbers. Can anyone else remember that book?

p.s. I'm sure we did logs when we were about 12-13 or so.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K