Quick question about significant figures

  • Thread starter Thread starter henry3369
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Significant figures
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the mass of ethanol (C2H5OH) required to produce 1000 kJ of heat, given the standard enthalpy of combustion of -1368 kJ·mol-1 and a molecular weight of 46.07 g·mol-1. The calculated mass is 33.68 g, which is reported with 4 significant figures. The confusion arises from the interpretation of the number of significant figures in the value 1000 kJ, which is considered an exact number in this context, thus allowing for 4 significant figures rather than 1. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding significant figures in scientific calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of significant figures in scientific measurements
  • Knowledge of dimensional analysis for unit conversions
  • Familiarity with enthalpy of combustion concepts
  • Basic chemistry knowledge regarding molecular weights
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the rules of significant figures in scientific calculations
  • Learn about dimensional analysis techniques in chemistry
  • Study the concept of enthalpy and its applications in thermodynamics
  • Explore the implications of exact numbers versus measured values in calculations
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone involved in scientific calculations requiring precision in significant figures.

henry3369
Messages
194
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What mass of ethanol, C2H5OH(l), must be burned to supply 1000 kJ of heat? The standard enthalpy of combustion of ethanol at 298 K is -1368 kJ⋅mol-1, and its molecular weight is 46.07 g⋅mol-1 .

I know how to solve this, but I'm unsure about the number of significant figures.

Homework Equations


Solved using dimensional analysis

The Attempt at a Solution


1000 kJ * (1 mol/1368kJ) * (46.07g/1mol) = 33.68 g.

So apparently 4 significant figures is correct, but I don't understand why. Shouldn't be 1 significant figure because 1000 was used in the calculation? My teacher takes off points for incorrect number of significant figures and I would've reported the answer as 30 g in this case. And I did check to make sure that 1000 wasn't followed by a decimal point (1000.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Even though there was no explicit decimal point, it is assume that there is an implicit decimal point. Otherwise it could have been 1001 or 999
 
phinds said:
Even though there was no explicit decimal point, it is assume that there is an implicit decimal point. Otherwise it could have been 1001 or 999
How do you know when you can assume there is a decimal point? Whenever a whole number is followed by a zero? So if it asked for 430 kJ instead of 1000 kJ, would I now use 3 significant figures?
 
Would you assume that 433 is 3 significant digits? If so, why would you NOT assume that 430 is 3 significant digits? In the absence of any information to the contrary, I think it is normal to assume that the given figure is good to the number of digits given. You DO have to be reasonable about that though. I would NOT assume that, say, 1,320,000 is 7 significant digits. There I would likely figure on 3.
 
It would be better - and less confusing - to use 1.000×103 notation. But I would go with 1000 meaning 4 sigfigs too.
 
In the statement of the problem, the figure 1000 kJ is not a measurement, but an exact number, so it (technically) has an infinite number of significant figures. If the problem had said, "when burning ethanol you measure 1000 kJ of heat to be evolved. Calculate the mass of ethanol," then I would agree that writing 1000 kJ implies only one significant figure, but the problem statement makes clear that 1000 kJ was not experimentally determined and therefore has no uncertainty.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phinds
I might suggest reviewing the rules of determining significant figures in scientific calculations and applying them to the calculation results in your problem.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
18K