Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Quick question on the EPR paper

  1. Nov 15, 2009 #1
    In the following link below, consider page 2, paragraph 2 ("To illustrate the ideas involved..."). The author Podolsky considers a particle with a 'single degree of freedom.' Then in eq. (6), he shows a true cartesian coordinate system.

    Isn't this an inconsistency with the paper?

    And as you can see from the link, there's a speedy answer to the question...

    http://www.drchinese.com/David/EPR.pdf
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 16, 2009 #2

    alxm

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    If so, I don't see it. Equation (6) is:
    [tex]P(a,b) = \int^b_a\psi^*\psi dx[/tex]
    That's a single spatial dimension there, x. A single degree of freedom. If it'd been a three dimensional space, you'd have had a volume integral.

    x is a scalar quantity here, not a vector. Perhaps that's what has you confused?
     
  4. Nov 16, 2009 #3
    Well polosky was using the word 'coordinate' quite frequently in and around eq. (6), so I am guessing he was referring to the cartesian coordinate, no?
     
  5. Nov 17, 2009 #4

    alxm

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    What do you mean 'Cartesian coordinate'? It's one-dimensional.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Quick question on the EPR paper
  1. A quick question (Replies: 7)

Loading...