"The Matrix" (De)Appreciation Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Locutus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thread
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the philosophical implications of "The Matrix" and its portrayal of reality. Participants express divergent views on the relevance of the film's concept of a fabricated reality, with some arguing it reflects modern consumerism while others dismiss it as a pop-culture fad. Key points include the paradox of free will versus fatalism as depicted in the film and the idea that questioning reality can lead to enlightenment. The conversation highlights the film's impact on philosophical discourse and its cultural significance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of philosophical concepts such as reality and perception
  • Familiarity with Zen Buddhism and its views on illusion
  • Knowledge of the narrative structure and themes in "The Matrix" franchise
  • Awareness of modern consumerism and its critique in popular culture
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the philosophical implications of Descartes' "Evil Genius" argument
  • Research Zen Buddhist concepts of reality and illusion
  • Analyze the narrative techniques used in "The Matrix" to convey philosophical ideas
  • Investigate the cultural impact of "The Matrix" on discussions of technology and reality
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, film studies scholars, cultural critics, and anyone interested in the intersection of technology, reality, and popular culture.

  • #31
Originally posted by Mentat
True. And yet, I don't see how that answers the "free will" question. Yes, you could make all of the people's actions be programmed, and set; but, if that were so, no one would ever leave the Matrix (the agents wouldn't let them, and they (the people) would have no "will" to try it).

But users' idiosyncratic input historoies aren't programmed into VR simulations. What is programmed are the VR responses to possible inputs. This is precisely why a VR program that was as good as the Matrix would run into combinatorial explosion while trying to figure out how to respond to the user. There are just too many things that users can do, and the program has to react to all of them convincingly.

Also, how does one explain the fact that Neo bled (in the real world) after having hit the ground in the simulation? That questions been bothering me for a while.

That I don't know. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some kind of feedback mechanism that the brain could use to cause internal bleeding if the brain was convinced that there was, in fact, bleeding. [?]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Originally posted by Psychodelirium
But users' idiosyncratic input historoies aren't programmed into VR simulations. What is programmed are the VR responses to possible inputs. This is precisely why a VR program that was as good as the Matrix would run into combinatorial explosion while trying to figure out how to respond to the user. There are just too many things that users can do, and the program has to react to all of them convincingly.

Do you mean that a computer has to be ready to handle all possible actions at any given time? This was my point, and I just don't see how it could be done. But, then again, I guess future technologies will allow for something like that.

That I don't know. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some kind of feedback mechanism that the brain could use to cause internal bleeding if the brain was convinced that there was, in fact, bleeding. [?]

Well, actually, it would have to (somehow) sever many layers of his flesh.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
32K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K