R-Linear and C-Linear Mappings.... Another Question ....

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of ##\mathbb{R}##-linear and ##\mathbb{C}##-linear mappings from ##\mathbb{C}## to ##\mathbb{C}##, as presented in Reinhold Remmert's "Theory of Complex Functions". Participants seek clarification on specific results regarding the conditions under which an ##\mathbb{R}##-linear mapping can also be considered ##\mathbb{C}##-linear, and the form of ##\mathbb{C}##-linear mappings.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Peter questions how an ##\mathbb{R}##-linear mapping ##T : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}## can also be ##\mathbb{C}##-linear under the condition that ##T(i) = i T(1)##.
  • Peter also seeks clarification on why a ##\mathbb{C}##-linear mapping takes the form ##T(z) = T(1) z##.
  • Another participant suggests defining linearity and applying the conditions for ##\mathbb{F}##-linear mappings to answer Peter's questions.
  • One participant outlines the conditions for a function to be ##\mathbb{F}##-linear, specifically additivity and homogeneity, and applies these to the case of ##\mathbb{F} = \mathbb{C}##.
  • Further exploration is suggested regarding the application of ##\mathbb{R}##-linearity to the mapping of complex numbers, particularly how it relates to the components of complex numbers.
  • Another participant notes that if ##T## is ##\mathbb{C}##-linear, then it follows that ##T(i) = i \cdot T(1)##, using specific examples to illustrate this point.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing levels of understanding regarding the implications of the conditions for linearity and how they apply to the mappings in question. There is no clear consensus on the answers to Peter's questions, as the discussion remains exploratory and unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion arising from the application of linearity conditions to complex numbers, particularly in distinguishing between real and complex components. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity in notation and definitions when addressing linear mappings.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Reinhold Remmert's book "Theory of Complex Functions" ...

I am focused on Chapter 0: Complex Numbers and Continuous Functions ... and in particular on Section 1.2:##\mathbb{R}##-linear and ##\mathbb{C}##]-linear mappings of ##\mathbb{C}## into ##\mathbb{C}## ... ...

I need help in order to fully understand one of Remmert's results regarding ##\mathbb{C}##-linear mappings of ##\mathbb{C}## into ##\mathbb{C}## ... ...

Remmert's section on ##\mathbb{R}##-linear and ##\mathbb{C}##-linear mappings of ##\mathbb{C}## into ##\mathbb{C}## reads as follows:
?temp_hash=b6a727075f8621b3dfa52509c2b5c764.png

?temp_hash=b6a727075f8621b3dfa52509c2b5c764.png

In the above text by Remmert we read the following: (... fairly near the start of the text ...)

" ... ... An ## \mathbb{R}##-linear mapping ##T : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}## is then ##\mathbb{C}##-linear when ##T(i) = i T(1)##; in this case it has the form ##T(z) = T(1) z##. ... ... "My questions are as follows:Question 1

How/why exactly is an ## \mathbb{R}##-linear mapping ##T : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}## also ##\mathbb{C}##-linear when ##T(i) = i T(1)## ... ... ?
Question 2

Why/how exactly does a ##\mathbb{C}##-linear mapping have the form ##T(z) = T(1) z## ... ...
Hope someone can help ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • Remmert - 1 - R-linear and C-linear Mappings, Ch. 0, Section 1.2 ... PART 1 .png
    Remmert - 1 - R-linear and C-linear Mappings, Ch. 0, Section 1.2 ... PART 1 .png
    32.2 KB · Views: 417
  • Remmert - 2 - R-linear and C-linear Mappings, Ch. 0, Section 1.2 ... PART 2 .png
    Remmert - 2 - R-linear and C-linear Mappings, Ch. 0, Section 1.2 ... PART 2 .png
    32.7 KB · Views: 419
  • ?temp_hash=b6a727075f8621b3dfa52509c2b5c764.png
    ?temp_hash=b6a727075f8621b3dfa52509c2b5c764.png
    32.2 KB · Views: 646
  • ?temp_hash=b6a727075f8621b3dfa52509c2b5c764.png
    ?temp_hash=b6a727075f8621b3dfa52509c2b5c764.png
    32.7 KB · Views: 605
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter!

What does linearity mean? Can you write down the two conditions for a function ##T## to be, say ##\mathbb{F}-##linear?

If so, can you apply it in the case ##\mathbb{F}=\mathbb{C}## on ##T(z\cdot 1)\,?##
This should answer your second question.
Next apply the case ##\mathbb{F}=\mathbb{R}## on ##T(a\cdot 1 + b \cdot i)\,.##
This should answer your first question.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math Amateur
The condition for a function ##T : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}## to be ##\mathbb{F}##]-linear are as follows:

Additivity

##T(w + z) = T(w) + T(z)## for all ##w,z \in \mathbb{C}## ... ... ... (1)

Homogeneity

##T( \lambda w ) = \lambda T(w)## for all ##\lambda \in \mathbb{F}## and ##w \in \mathbb{C}## ... ... ... (2)Now apply the above to ##\mathbb{F} = \mathbb{C}## on ##T( z \cdot 1 )##

Then ... we have ... ##T( z \cdot 1 ) = z T(1)##

But ... ##T( z \cdot 1 ) = T(z)## ...

So ... ##T(z) = z T(1) = T(1) z## ... so, question 2 above is answered ... ...Now try to get answer to question 1 ...

Let ##z = a + b i## ... and ##\mathbb{F} = \mathbb{R}## ...

Then ##T(z) = T(a \cdot 1) = a T(1) + b T(i)## ... ...

BUT ... where to from here ...?Can you help further ...

Peter
 
Math Amateur said:
The condition for a function ##T : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}## to be ##\mathbb{F}##]-linear are as follows:

Additivity

##T(w + z) = T(w) + T(z)## for all ##w,z \in \mathbb{C}## ... ... ... (1)

Homogeneity

##T( \lambda w ) = \lambda T(w)## for all ##\lambda \in \mathbb{F}## and ##w \in \mathbb{C}## ... ... ... (2)

Now try to get answer to question 1 ...

Let ##z = a + b i## ... and ##\mathbb{F} = \mathbb{R}## ...

Then ##T(z) = T(a \cdot 1) = a T(1) + b T(i)## ... ...
Firstly, here is a typo: ##T(z) = T(z \cdot 1)## but this isn't of interest in the first step.

We have for ##z=a+ib \in \mathbb{C}## that ##a,b\in \mathbb{R}##. Now ##T## is ##\mathbb{R}-##linear, so we apply first additivity and get ##T(z)=T(a+ib)=T(a)+T(ib)##. This might be confusing, as one of the summands isn't real. However, we have the ##\mathbb{R}-##linearity on the vector space ##\mathbb{R}^2\cong \mathbb{C}##, that is ##T((a,b))=T((a,0))+T((0,b))## and the difference between ##(a,b)## and ##a+ib## is merely a notation one.

Next we apply homogeneity which is allowed, because ##a,b \in \mathbb{R}##. Thus we get ##T(z)=\ldots = T(a \cdot 1)+ T(b \cdot i)=a\cdot T(1) + b\cdot T(i)##. Here we are stuck, but we have an additional condition from question 1
Question 1

How/why exactly is an ## \mathbb{R}##-linear mapping ##T : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}## also ##\mathbb{C}##-linear when ##T(i) = i T(1)## ... ... ?
With that, we have ##T(z)=\ldots =a\cdot T(1) + b\cdot T(i) = a \cdot T(1) + b\cdot i\cdot T(1)= (a+bi)\cdot T(1)= z\cdot T(1)## which is ##\mathbb{C}-##homogeneity. From this we also get ##T(z_1+z_2)=T(z_1)+T(z_2)## since the complex addition goes componentwise: the ##a_j## add and the ##b_j## do, and we can proceed in the same way.

Both together is ##\mathbb{C}-##linearity.

And from the answer to question 1 we see, that it also holds in the opposite direction: If ##T## is ##\mathbb{C}-##linear, then ##T(i)=i \cdot T(1)##, simply use ##z=i\,.##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math Amateur
Thanks fresh_42 ...

I appreciate your help ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K