Is Your Friend's Radiation Exposure in Guarapari Safe Compared to UK Standards?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Taylor_1989
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Word problem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The radiation exposure for a person working on the beach in Guarapari is significantly higher than in the UK. The calculated total exposure is approximately 0.0427 Sv per year, which exceeds the UK occupational dose limit of 0.02 Sv. Therefore, the correct cautionary advice is that the background dose will exceed the dose limit in the UK for a person who works with radiation, confirming option e) as the appropriate choice. This analysis highlights the importance of understanding local radiation levels when considering relocation for work.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radiation dose units (Sv, mSv, μSv)
  • Familiarity with background radiation levels in different regions
  • Knowledge of UK radiation dose limits for occupational exposure
  • Basic mathematical skills for calculating annual radiation exposure
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the health effects of long-term exposure to radiation
  • Investigate radiation safety guidelines for workers in high-exposure environments
  • Learn about radiation monitoring tools and techniques
  • Explore the differences in radiation regulations between countries
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for health professionals, environmental scientists, and individuals considering relocation to areas with varying radiation levels, particularly those involved in occupational safety and health regulations.

Taylor_1989
Messages
400
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


A friend tells you that she is planning to change her life by moving from the UK to the Brazilian resort of Guarapari, where she intends to make and sell food on the beach for the tourists for 8 hours a day, every day. Whilst pleased for her adventurous plan, you are a little concerned by your specialist knowledge that the radiation dose rate on the beach there is typically 14 μSv h##^{-1}##, due to exceptionally high natural background from the local sand and soil. However, the average background dose in town of 2.7 mSv year##^{-1}## is the same as the UK. Use the above information to estimate the background dose she might expect from living and working there in order to decide which of following options for cautionary advice you would give to her.

select 1
a. Your background dose will increase by a factor of 45
b. Your background dose will double
c. Your background dose will be more than double the dose limit in the UK for a person who works with radiation
d. Your background dose will increase by a factor of 10
e. Your background dose will exceed the dose limit in the UK for a person who works with radiation.

Homework Equations


N/A

The Attempt at a Solution


I would like to know if I have followed the correct logic is answering this question?

The key points I took from the word problem are as followed

1. She is on the beach for 8hrs
2. she works 7 days a week
3. Time she is not on the beach is: 24-8=16hrs
4. Dosage per year when not on beach and in town is 2.7mSv per year

So my steps are a follows
Radiation exposure per hour when not on the beach
$$\frac{2.7\cdot 10^{-3}Sv}{1y}\cdot \frac{1y}{365d}=\frac{7.4\cdot10^{-6}Sv}{d}$$
$$\frac{7.4\cdot10^{-6}Sv}{d}\cdot \frac{1d}{24hr}=\frac{3.08\cdot 10^{-7}Sv}{hr}$$

working hours spent on beach per year
$$8 \cdot 365 = 2920hr $$

hours spent of beach per year
$$16 \cdot 365 = 5840 hr$$

Radiation exposure per year on beach
$$\frac{14 \cdot 10^{-6}}{hr} \cdot 2920hr= 0.04Sv$$

Radiation exposure per year off beach
$$\frac{3.08\cdot 10^{-7}sV}{hr} \cdot 5840hr =1.8\cdot 10^{-3}Sv$$ (rounded)

Total exposure
$$T=0.0418Sv$$

Now as radiation exposure in the Uk is $0.02Sv$ my ans is e)

Have I calculated this correctly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Taylor_1989 said:
Have I calculated this correctly?
Yes.

As this is a multiple choice question it doesn't matter here, but in general be careful how you round where. You rounded the beach exposure to 0.04 Sv and added 0.0018 Sv. The first number with more digits is actually 0.0409 Sv - if you add the two you get 0.0427, not 0.0418. If you want to have more than one significant digit for the sum, don't round the larger number to one digit.
 
Taylor_1989 said:
my ans is e)
Is that based on some info re UK dose limits that you have not included in your post?
Or did you mean option b?
 
haruspex said:
Is that based on some info re UK dose limits that you have not included in your post?
Or did you mean option b?

The dosage is one I have read from the UK, with the number that mfb mentioned my ans should be c) as it is more than double the reccomended dosage. I was told to look up dosage or occupational worker in the Uk for this type of question and the general dosage eemed to be 20mSv or 0.02Sv
 
Taylor_1989 said:
The dosage is one I have read from the UK, with the number that mfb mentioned my ans should be c) as it is more than double the reccomended dosage. I was told to look up dosage or occupational worker in the Uk for this type of question and the general dosage eemed to be 20mSv or 0.02Sv
Ok.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K