MHB Radian Measure: Show Cone Surface Area is $\pi rl$

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sherlock16
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cone Measure
AI Thread Summary
A cone's curved surface area can be derived by transforming it into a sector of a circle with radius equal to the slant height, \( l \), and angle \( \theta \). The relationship between the arc length of the sector and the circumference of the cone's base leads to the equation \( l\theta = 2\pi r \). By calculating the area of the sector, which is given by \( \frac{1}{2}l^2\theta \), and substituting for \( \theta \), it can be shown that the curved surface area of the cone is \( \pi rl \). This derivation highlights the connection between the geometry of the cone and the properties of circular sectors. Understanding this relationship is crucial for solving problems involving cone surface areas.
Sherlock16
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A cone with base radius $r$, vertical height $h$ and slant height $l$ has its curved surface slit and flattened out into a sector with radius $l$ and angle $\theta$. By comparing the arc length of this sector with the circumference of the base of the cone, show that $l\theta = 2\pi r$, and deduce by calculating the area of the sector, that the curved surface area of the cone is $\pi rl$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Welcome, Sherlock16!

Please show what you've tried or what your thoughts are on this problem, so that we could better assist you.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top