Radiation Hard Electronic Design for LVO Long Mission

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arend
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the design considerations for radiation-hardened electronic components intended for a long-duration mission in low Venus orbit (LVO). Participants explore the implications of the Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) environment on electronic reliability, particularly regarding latch-up conditions compared to low Earth orbit (LEO) missions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that Venus lacks a magnetosphere, suggesting that the GCR environment will be significantly harsher than in LEO, raising concerns about the adequacy of standard radiation-hard components with a tested immunity of LET = 85 MeV-cm2/mg.
  • There is a question about whether additional protection against latch-up should be incorporated into designs for a Venus mission, given the expected radiation levels over a long mission duration.
  • Another participant summarizes that while standard LEO designs are considered safe with current radiation-hard components, the conditions for a Venus mission may differ, warranting further investigation.
  • Several references to studies and articles regarding the radiation environment around Venus and its implications for electronic design are provided, indicating ongoing research in this area.
  • One participant argues that the radiation encountered in a Venus mission does not present unique challenges compared to LEO, but rather that the radiation is more intense, leading to quicker accumulation of integrated dose and a higher rate of single event upsets.
  • There is a suggestion to plan electronics accordingly to mitigate the effects of increased radiation exposure during the mission.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the radiation environment in Venus necessitates fundamentally different design considerations compared to LEO. Some argue for additional protective measures, while others believe that existing designs may suffice with appropriate planning.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various studies and models regarding the radiation environment at Venus, but there is no consensus on the specific design requirements or the extent of additional protections needed for latch-up conditions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to engineers and researchers involved in space mission design, particularly those focused on radiation effects on electronic components in harsh environments.

Arend
Messages
21
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
For std LEO electronic design, the modern radiation-hard components with a Single Event Latchup (SEL) Immune to LET = 85 MeV-cm2/mg are in a safe condition. What about for a Venus mission?
Venus does not have a magnetosphere, so the Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) environment shall be much worse than in a LEO environment. Looking to the std radiation models for Venus, the standard radiation-hard space level electronic component with tested immunity LET = 85 MeV-cm2/mg seems not enough, so, for example, a 1cm2 Si die will suffer considerable flux above this level during a long mission (10 years for example). So, the question is, usually we are not paying attention to latch-up condition for LEO designs, as using tested immunity LET = 85 MeV-cm2/mg, but for a venus mission (LVO), shall be design be different, including additional protection against Latchup? Thank you!!!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this question for schoolwork?
 
Arend said:
TL;DR Summary: For std LEO electronic design, the modern radiation-hard components with a Single Event Latchup (SEL) Immune to LET = 85 MeV-cm2/mg are in a safe condition. What about for a Venus mission?

venus mission (LVO),
LVO = Low Venus Orbit?

What references has one found regarding the radiation environment around Venus, or at

For example:

Venus Radiation environment monitor (VeRad) for the Venus Orbiter Mission
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022cosp...44..331S/abstract

Revisiting the cosmic-ray induced Venusian radiation dose in the context of habitability
https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2020/01/aa36968-19/aa36968-19.html

Ionization of the venusian atmosphere from solar and galactic cosmic rays
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103514004941

Venus has an orbit with a semi-major axis of 0.723 au (108,200,000 km; 67,200,000 mi), and an eccentricity of 0.007. Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orbit_of_Venus

https://angeo.copernicus.org/articles/34/595/2016/angeo-34-595-2016.pdf

Galactic Cosmic Rays at Mars and Venus: Temporal Variations from Hours to Decades
Measured as the Background Signal of Onboard Microchannel Plates
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ac9a49/pdf

For those not familiar with SEU or SEL. (single event upset or latchup)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latch-up

https://www.ti.com/lit/rr/slvk043a/slvk043a.pdf?ts=1760173958547

https://www.doeeet.com/content/eee-...ion/single-event-latchup-protection-circuits/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker and berkeman
A Venus mission doesn't have anything you don't see in LEO. The radiation is just more intense:
* You accumulate an integrated dose quicker - but longer missions in Earth orbit can end up with the same.
* You get a higher rate of single event upsets. Plan the electronics accordingly.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K