Radio Power Conversion: Convert mV/m or nW/m2 to Watts

  • Thread starter Thread starter coltonk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power Radio
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on converting measurements from RFExplorer, which displays power in mV/m and nW/m2, into watts to assess antenna efficiency. It highlights that nW/m2 reflects power at a specific location but does not account for the antenna's radiation pattern, which affects readings based on directionality. Suggestions include using an SWR meter for more accurate power measurements and considering a test range with a far-field meter for comparative analysis. Mapping the radiation pattern with a rotator can further enhance understanding of antenna performance. Accurate computation of absolute efficiency is deemed important for optimizing antenna design.
coltonk
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
Converting units of transmitted power
I have searched the internet and spoken to the manufacturer of my equipment and can not find an answer. I am using RFExplorer (test equipment) to measure the power generated by my ham radio antenna. The only options for displayed power is mV/m or nW/m2. I am trying to find out how to convert these into transmitted watts so I can see how efficient my antenna is radiating and my radio output is watts.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Can you just borrow an SWR meter instead? BTW, mV/m is the E-field strength.

1650991721426.png

https://www.wimo.com/en/cn-901hp-swr-meter

Is this your meter/spectrum analyzer?

1650988178300.png
 
Last edited:
nW/m2 is the best your meter can do with power measurements. It is the power measurement at the measurement location, a surface measured in m2. The problem is your meter doesn't know about how the antenna radiates in the other directions. With everything else being equal a more directive antenna will give you a higher reading on the beam axis, and lower readings off of the beam axis.

So, if you could measure in every direction, you could add up the total power. Really, you're integrating the measurements over a closed surface around the antenna. Alternatively, if you know the radiation pattern of your antenna, maybe you could use the meter to calibrate a theoretical summation over all directions.
 
berkeman said:
Can you just borrow an SWR meter instead? BTW, mV/m is the E-field strength.

View attachment 300618
https://www.wimo.com/en/cn-901hp-swr-meter

Is this your meter/spectrum analyzer?

View attachment 300616
That's what I have..
 
Is computation of absolute efficiency important?
Why not set up a test range with a far field meter, say beyond 60λ. Then you can make comparative measurements to improve the design relative to a simple dipole. If you have a rotator for your antenna under test you can also map the radiation pattern.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and DaveE
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top