What is the expected coverage range for my FM radio station in Lahore, Pakistan?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the expected coverage range for a newly licensed FM radio station in Lahore, Pakistan. Participants explore various factors that could influence the station's broadcast range, including equipment specifications, environmental conditions, and regulatory considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the coverage area of their FM station based on their transmitter and antenna specifications.
  • Another participant estimates that under optimal conditions, the range could extend to about 20 miles, depending on terrain and weather.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the power rating of the antenna and how it can handle the transmitter's output of 2.3kW.
  • Some participants suggest that the licensing authority should have assessed the coverage area and its impact on existing services.
  • A reference is made to a program called Radio Mobile, which could assist in mapping the coverage area.
  • One participant discusses the historical context of FM broadcasting and how interference has evolved, providing a detailed calculation of expected Effective Radiated Power (ERP) and potential coverage distances based on ITU guidelines.
  • Another participant questions the sustainability of the station given the potential mismatch between coverage area and audience size, highlighting financial implications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the expected coverage area, with some estimates suggesting 20 miles under good conditions, while others propose up to 40 km based on technical calculations. There is no consensus on the exact coverage range, and concerns about interference and planning are debated.

Contextual Notes

Factors such as terrain, weather conditions, and existing radio noise are noted as significant variables that could affect the coverage area. The discussion also highlights the importance of regulatory compliance and planning in broadcasting.

Hassan Jalil
Hello, I am from Lahore, Pakistan,
I have obtained a FM transmission License in Lahore.
and i am about to set my radio station here in few days. i have ordered the equipment which will reach here in 5-7 days more...
here i am going to give you my broadcasting equipment details:
now i am curious to know about the range or the area of coverage with this equipment (in Miles or Km's)

Tranmitter:
ArmStrong 2.5kW Solid State FM Amplifier
Features:


[Adjustable Power : 50 – 2500 Watts
(I have to set it on 2.3kW)
Frequency Range : 87.5/88 – 108 MHz
Proven in the world’s worst environments by the US Military
Automatic Power Factor Correction
VSWR Foldback and Protection
Automatic Power Output Control
(Made in USA)]

Antenna:
ArmStrong FMA-707 8 – Bay Circularly Polarized FM Antennas

Features:

[True Circular Polarization
Heavy Duty Brass Construction
Type N Input, doesn’t not require pressurization
Extremely Low Loss Power Divider
Balance Feed Straps
Factory Tuned to 95.0 MHz for Exceptional Performance
(Made in USA)]

200feet Tower will be used for antenna on a 58 feet roof top (Total height will be 258 feet) from ground level.

now i am curious to know about the range or the area of coverage with this equipment (in Miles or Km's)

Please give answer... asap
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
There are honestly a lot of factors which could affect the range such as the weather, the terrain around you, and how much radio noise is in the area. I would estimate that under good weather conditions, across flat terrain, and in a rural area, the range will extend to the horizon which is about 20 miles.
 
Hassan Jalil said:
Antenna:
ArmStrong FMA-707 8 – Bay Circularly Polarized FM Antennas
Welcome to the PF.

That antenna appears to be rated for 500W each. How are you planning on driving your 2500W into it/them?

http://www.armstrongtx.com/pdf/fma-707.pdf
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to the PF.

That antenna appears to be rated for 500W each. How are you planning on driving your 2500W into it/them?

http://www.armstrongtx.com/pdf/fma-707.pdf
Hello,
This is 8 bay antenna
Each bay carry 500W
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Mostly, when people spend a load of money on a Broadcast radio transmitter, they have planned for a certain coverage and for protection of distant services from outgoing interference - i.e. you plan, then you buy. Doesn't your licensing authority have any idea about the effect of your presence on the existing network? Amazing; they just issued you with a license for kiloWatts of transmissions.
Doesn't the ITU have anything to say about that?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tech99, Averagesupernova and davenn
Hassan Jalil said:
now i am curious to know about the range or the area of coverage with this equipment (in Miles or Km's)

NFuller said:
There are honestly a lot of factors which could affect the range such as the weather, the terrain around you, and how much radio noise is in the area. I would estimate that under good weather conditions, across flat terrain, and in a rural area, the range will extend to the horizon which is about 20 miles.
agreed

there's a program called Radio Mobile designed specifically for mapping coverage area that may help you out
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
I would expect the Licensing Authority to have worked out the coverage area, as mentioned by Sophie Centaur.
The problem is that the range is likely to be dictated by interference from other stations, which makes it impossible to predict.
A paper on the topic of required field strength for FM planning, based on UK conditions, is at the following URL:
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0013/54310/annex-f.pdf
This suggests a minimum field strength for a portable receiver of 40 dBuV/m, whereas the primary service area would require 60 dBuV/m, giving Hi Fi reception.
It is interesting how the situation has changed over the half century since FM started in the UK (USA is different). First of all it was expected that roof mounted Yagis would be used, although the receivers were rather poor. Ignition interference was the main problem. Then stereo was introduced, which created a severe performance penalty, and car and portable receivers for FM became more common. Receivers improved with the use of low noise transistors, and finally, local broadcasting started, creating an interference limited situation. So we are now roughly where we were in 1955!
The ITU published the following document giving curves of field strength versus distance for various situations:-
http://www.itu.int/dms_pubrec/itu-r/rec/p/R-REC-P.370-7-199510-W!PDF-E.pdf
Your transmitter ERP can be worked out as follows:-
TX power 2.3kW = +33.6 dBW
Antenna gain +4 dBd circular polarisation
Antenna gain +1 dB for linear pol. RX antenna
ERP = 33.6 + 1 = 34.6 dBW
Therefore the ITU curves, which are based on 1kW ERP, should be adjusted by 4.6dB.
Assuming an interference-free environment and using the ITU curves, I obtain a range of 40km for the primary service area, giving Hi Fi reception, and 80km for a portable receiver where quality is unimportant.
Finally, the terrain in Lahore is unknown to me and may alter the coverage considerable where there are hills, valleys and high buildings.
 
tech99 said:
I would expect the Licensing Authority to have worked out the coverage area, as mentioned by Sophie Centaur.
That's only half of the equation, though. If the station is Independent, it will be funded by advertising and the income will be related to the audience size (and demographic). Running and capital costs are affected by service area size and it is easy to find that costly Watts are finding they way to areas with no population or adverse terrain. Advertising revenue is never over-lavish so is the station going to sustain itself?
The whole project seems odd to me, as an Engineer. The BBC and other serious broadcasters wouldn't consider putting up a transmitter until they were sure that it was matched to the requirement. Perhaps that's why a number of would-be broadcasting companies fail - poor planning.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
8K