Raychaudhuri equation in Jacobson's paper (gr-qc/9504004) ?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter im_hammer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Paper
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Jacobson's paper "Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State" (gr-qc/9504004) presents the Raychaudhuri equation as (Eq.(4)): \(\frac{d\theta}{d\lambda}=-\frac{1}{2}\theta^{2}-\sigma^{2}-R_{ab}k^{a}k^{b}\). This differs from the formulation in General Relativity textbooks, such as Wald's, which includes the term \(\hat{\omega}_{ab}\hat{\omega}^{ab}\). The absence of this term in Jacobson's equation raises questions about its value and the definitions of \(\sigma\) and \(\hat{\sigma}\). The discussion concludes that the vorticity tensor vanishes due to the orthogonality of lightlike vectors to themselves.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity principles
  • Familiarity with the Raychaudhuri equation
  • Knowledge of vorticity tensors in differential geometry
  • Ability to interpret mathematical formulations in physics papers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Raychaudhuri equation in various contexts
  • Examine the implications of the vorticity tensor in General Relativity
  • Review Jacobson's paper in detail for insights on thermodynamic interpretations
  • Explore advanced texts on General Relativity, focusing on Wald's formulations
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in theoretical physics, students of General Relativity, and anyone interested in the thermodynamic aspects of spacetime and the Raychaudhuri equation.

im_hammer
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
In Jacobson's famous paper "Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State" (gr-qc/9504004) Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1260–1263 (1995) , he wrote the Raychaudhuri equation as (Eq.(4) in his paper):

\frac{d\theta}{d\lambda}=-\frac{1}{2}\theta^{2}-\sigma^{2}-R_{ab}k^{a}k^{b}

However, in General Relativity textbooks, Raychaudhuri equation is written as: (for example, Eq.(9.2.32) in Wald's GR book)

\frac{d\theta}{d\lambda}=-\frac{1}{2}\theta^{2}-\hat{\sigma}_{ab}\hat{\sigma}^{ab}+\hat{\omega}_{ab}\hat{\omega}^{ab}-R_{cd}k^{c}k^{d}

Why is the term \hat{\omega}_{ab}\hat{\omega}^{ab} missing in Jacobson's paper, or is it equal to Zero?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How are \sigma and \hat{\sigma} defined?
 
The link to the paper is

http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9504004.

Because a lightlike vector is orthogonal to itself, the null generators of the horizon are orthogonal to the horizon (hypersurface orhtogonal), and thus, by Frobenius' theorem, the vorticity tensor vanishes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K