Rayleigh Ritz with two Particles

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving for two particles in a harmonic oscillator using the Rayleigh Ritz method, specifically addressing the diagonalization of the Hamiltonian with a delta function interaction. The user encounters a rank 4 tensor, \langle \psi_{ij}|H|\psi_{kl}\rangle, which complicates the extraction of the eigensystem in Mathematica. It is suggested that defining a basis of two-particle states, formed from the tensor product of single-particle states, simplifies the Hamiltonian to a manageable 2x2 matrix. This approach allows for easier handling of the calculations compared to the original rank 4 tensor. The discussion emphasizes the importance of properly defining the two-particle basis for effective computation.
wduff
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone, I have what should be a simple one to answer.

I'm solving for 2 particles in a harmonic oscillator with a gaussian bump in the middle and a delta function interaction. I'm doing all this via Rayleigh Ritz; that is, diagonalizing the Hamiltonian to find the constants in:

\Psi = \sum_{ij} c_{ij} \psi_{ij}

Where ##\Psi_{ij}## is just the standard symmetrized 2 boson wavefunction with ##\psi_{i}## and ##\psi_{j}## in a harmonic oscillator basis.

My issue is this: I end up with a rank 4 tensor: \langle \psi_{ij}|H|\psi_{kl}\rangle

I'm sure this is just inexperience, but I have no idea how to get an eigensystem out of that (I'm using mathematica). I've already done it with one particle (minus the delta function of course), which was simple enough, since the calculations produced a n x n matrix which I know how to handle. But this is a new one for me.

Any suggestions would be very appreciated. Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
One needs to define a basis of two-particle states, which are themselves the tenor product of single-particle states.

In that two-particle basis, the Hamiltonian will be a 2x2 matrix.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K