Finding Probability of Two-Identical-Particle System in a Given State

In summary, the problem involves two identical spinless particles and their states, which are spanned by an orthonormal system. The problem asks for the probability of finding the particles in certain states, as well as the probability of one particle being in a specific state. It also considers the case where the particles are not identical and cannot be distinguished by an instrument. The solution may involve writing wave functions as a sum of symmetric or anti-symmetric functions. The problem statement and your attempts at a solution are given above.
  • #1
Samama Fahim
50
4
Problem: A system contains two identical spinless particles. The one particle states are spanned by an orthonormal system ##|\phi_k>##. Suppose that particle states are ##|\phi_i>## and ##|\phi_j>## (##i \neq j##). (a) Find the probability of finding the particle in the state ##|\xi>## and ##|\eta>## (not necessarily eigenstate) (b) What is the probability that one of them is in state ##|\xi>##? (c) Suppose now that the particles are not identical and they are measured with an instrument that cannot distinguish between them. Given an answer to part (a) and (b) in this case.

If the two identical particles are fermions, then we might probably write:

$$\Psi_{i,j}(\vec{r_1},\vec{r_2}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\phi_i(\vec{r_1}) \phi_j(\vec{r_2}) - \phi_i(\vec{r_2}) \phi_j(\vec{r_1})).$$

And if these particles are bosons, we might write:

$$\Psi_{i,j}(\vec{r_1},\vec{r_2}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\phi_i(\vec{r_1}) \phi_j(\vec{r_2}) + \phi_i(\vec{r_2}) \phi_j(\vec{r_1})).$$

Do symmetric or anti-symmetric wavefunctions form a complete set? Can we write some wave function ##\Phi## as

$$\Phi = \sum_{i,j} c_{ij} \Psi_{i,j}$$?

Perhaps, one of the ##\Psi_{i,j}## equals ##\Psi_{i,j}(\vec{r_1},\vec{r_2}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\xi(\vec{r_1}) \eta(\vec{r_2}) \pm \eta(\vec{r_2}) \xi(\vec{r_1}))## and we are supposed to find the inner product of ##|\xi, \eta>## with ##\Phi##? Is that what the problem asks one to do? If not, please give me a hint as to what the problem is really about. If you would know the source of the problem, please refer me to it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Samama Fahim said:
Is that what the problem asks one to do? If not, please give me a hint as to what the problem is really about.
Is this a homework problem?

Samama Fahim said:
If you would know the source of the problem, please refer me to it.
I'm confused about why you don't know the source of the problem. How can you state the problem if you don't know where it came from?
 
  • #3
PeterDonis said:
Is this a homework problem?I'm confused about why you don't know the source of the problem. How can you state the problem if you don't know where it came from?
It's been assigned by the instructor.
 
  • #4
PeterDonis said:
Is this a homework problem?I'm confused about why you don't know the source of the problem. How can you state the problem if you don't know where it came from?
Yes it is a homework problem. Could you give me a hint where I might start?
 
  • #5
Samama Fahim said:
Yes it is a homework problem.
Exactly what part of the OP of this thread is the problem, and what part is your attempts at a solution?
 
  • #6
PeterDonis said:
Exactly what part of the OP of this thread is the problem, and what part is your attempts at a solution?
What are ##|\xi>## and ##|\eta>##? Are these single particle states? I don't know where to start since I don't understand the problem statement. The only thing I know is how to write symmetric and antisymmetric wave function. What follows the problem statement in the OP is my attempt.
 
  • #7
Samama Fahim said:
I don't know where to start since I don't understand the problem statement.
What part of the OP is the problem statement? Where does the problem statement end and your questions about it start?
 
  • #8
Samama Fahim said:
I don't know where to start since I don't understand the problem statement.
Are you sure you're giving us the problem statement exactly as it was given to you? If you have some way to link to the actual problem statement, or post an image of it, that would help.
 
  • #9
Samama Fahim said:
Problem: A system contains two identical spinless particles. The one particle states are spanned by an orthonormal system ##|\phi_k>##. Suppose that particle states are ##|\phi_i>## and ##|\phi_j>## (##i \neq j##). (a) Find the probability of finding the particle in the state ##|\xi>## and ##|\eta>## (not necessarily eigenstate) (b) What is the probability that one of them is in state ##|\xi>##? (c) Suppose now that the particles are not identical and they are measured with an instrument that cannot distinguish between them. Given an answer to part (a) and (b) in this case.

If the two identical particles are fermions, then we might probably write:

$$\Psi_{i,j}(\vec{r_1},\vec{r_2}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\phi_i(\vec{r_1}) \phi_j(\vec{r_2}) - \phi_i(\vec{r_2}) \phi_j(\vec{r_1})).$$

And if these particles are bosons, we might write:

$$\Psi_{i,j}(\vec{r_1},\vec{r_2}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\phi_i(\vec{r_1}) \phi_j(\vec{r_2}) + \phi_i(\vec{r_2}) \phi_j(\vec{r_1})).$$

Do symmetric or anti-symmetric wavefunctions form a complete set? Can we write some wave function ##\Phi## as

$$\Phi = \sum_{i,j} c_{ij} \Psi_{i,j}$$?

Perhaps, one of the ##\Psi_{i,j}## equals ##\Psi_{i,j}(\vec{r_1},\vec{r_2}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\xi(\vec{r_1}) \eta(\vec{r_2}) \pm \eta(\vec{r_2}) \xi(\vec{r_1}))## and we are supposed to find the inner product of ##|\xi, \eta>## with ##\Phi##? Is that what the problem asks one to do? If not, please give me a hint as to what the problem is really about. If you would know the source of the problem, please refer me to it.
Problem statement ends here "Given an answer to part (a) and (b) in this case." What follows is my attempt.
 
  • #10
PeterDonis said:
Are you sure you're giving us the problem statement exactly as it was given to you? If you have some way to link to the actual problem statement, or post an image of it, that would help.
I tried googling the problem statement but nothing relevant came up. Not even close.
 
  • #11
Samama Fahim said:
Problem statement ends here "Given an answer to part (a) and (b) in this case." What follows is my attempt.
Ok, thanks, that's helpful.

My first observation would be that, since the problem statement says the particles are spinless, you know they are bosons, so that's the only possibility you need to consider for the case where they are identical/indistinguishable.

Samama Fahim said:
What are ##|\xi>## and ##|\eta>##? Are these single particle states?
I think that is the intention; that is, I think part (a) is asking for the probability of finding one particle in state ##\ket{\xi}## and one particle in state ##\ket{\eta}##, and part (b) is asking for the probability of finding one particle in state ##\ket{\xi}##.

However, the best way to know for sure what the intent of the problem statement is is to ask your instructor about anything you are not sure about. We can only speculate here because we didn't assign the problem, your instructor did.
 
  • #12
Samama Fahim said:
if these particles are bosons, we might write:

$$\Psi_{i,j}(\vec{r_1},\vec{r_2}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\phi_i(\vec{r_1}) \phi_j(\vec{r_2}) + \phi_i(\vec{r_2}) \phi_j(\vec{r_1})).$$
This is not the only possible wave function for a state with two indistinguishable bosons. You also have to account for the possibility of both bosons being in the same state.
 
  • #13
PeterDonis said:
Ok, thanks, that's helpful.

My first observation would be that, since the problem statement says the particles are spinless, you know they are bosons, so that's the only possibility you need to consider for the case where they are identical/indistinguishable.I think that is the intention; that is, I think part (a) is asking for the probability of finding one particle in state ##\ket{\xi}## and one particle in state ##\ket{\eta}##, and part (b) is asking for the probability of finding one particle in state ##\ket{\xi}##.

However, the best way to know for sure what the intent of the problem statement is is to ask your instructor about anything you are not sure about. We can only speculate here because we didn't assign the problem, your instructor did.
Bosons also have spin. Don't they?
 
  • #14
PeterDonis said:
This is not the only possible wave function for a state with two indistinguishable bosons. You also have to account for the possibility of both bosons being in the same state.
Do symmetric wave functions of this sort form a complete set?
 
  • #15
Samama Fahim said:
Bosons also have spin. Don't they?
Spin-zero, i.e., spinless, particles are bosons. Zero is an integer, and any particle with integer spin is a boson.

Samama Fahim said:
Do symmetric wave functions of this sort form a complete set?
They do in the sense that any symmetric wave function can be expressed as a linear combination of a basis set of symmetric wave functions.
 
  • #16
PeterDonis said:
You also have to account for the possibility of both bosons being in the same state.
Reading the problem statement again, it might rule this out. If the problem statement specifies that the two bosons start out in different one-particle states, then the wave function for the two-particle system at the start would only need to account for that possibility.
 
  • #17
Samama Fahim said:
Do symmetric wave functions of this sort form a complete set?
I don't know that this is relevant to the problem. If you know the wave function of the two-particle system at the start, then computing probabilities of possible measurement results is just a matter of taking the inner product of that wave function with the appropriate wave functions describing those measurement results.
 

1. What is the definition of probability in a two-identical-particle system?

In a two-identical-particle system, probability refers to the likelihood of finding both particles in a specific state at the same time.

2. How is the probability of a two-identical-particle system calculated?

The probability of a two-identical-particle system is calculated by taking the square of the absolute value of the wave function for the two particles in the given state.

3. Can the probability of a two-identical-particle system be greater than 1?

No, the probability of a two-identical-particle system cannot be greater than 1. This is because the total probability of finding the particles in any state must always equal 1.

4. How does the probability of a two-identical-particle system change with the distance between the particles?

The probability of a two-identical-particle system decreases as the distance between the particles increases. This is due to the wave function for the particles becoming more spread out and therefore having a lower amplitude at any given point.

5. Is the probability of a two-identical-particle system affected by the particles' spin?

Yes, the probability of a two-identical-particle system can be affected by the particles' spin. This is because the wave function for particles with different spin states will have different amplitudes, which can impact the overall probability of finding the particles in a given state.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
667
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
758
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
872
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
737
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
862
Back
Top