I Rayleigh scattering VS Raman scattering

Click For Summary
Rayleigh scattering is used for applications requiring elastic scattering of light, such as atmospheric studies and understanding light scattering in gases. In contrast, Raman scattering, which involves inelastic scattering, is applied in molecular spectroscopy to gain insights into molecular vibrations and chemical composition. The choice between elastic and inelastic scattering depends on the information needed from the interaction with photons. Understanding the context of the incident light or single photon is crucial for selecting the appropriate scattering method. Both techniques serve distinct purposes in scientific research and analysis.
Ebi Rogha
Messages
24
Reaction score
6
TL;DR
When studying incidental photons, when should I use elastic scattering (Rayleigh scattering) and when inelastic scattering (Raman Scattering)?
What is the application of each of them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ebi Rogha said:
I do not understand when we use elastic approach and when use inelastic approach for:
1- an incident light
2-an incident single photon
Is this an idle question? Or, is there some specific reason for asking?
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
First, I need to check that I have the 3 notations correct for an inner product in finite vector spaces over a complex field; v* means: given the isomorphism V to V* then: (a) physicists and others: (u,v)=v*u ; linear in the second argument (b) some mathematicians: (u,v)=u*v; linear in the first argument. (c) bra-ket: <v|u>= (u,v) from (a), so v*u . <v|u> is linear in the second argument. If these are correct, then it would seem that <v|u> being linear in the second...

Similar threads