Reaction diffusion problem concentric spheres

  • Thread starter scg08
  • Start date
  • #1
1
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Hello,

I am trying to (numerically) solve the following reaction-diffusion equation for the probability density of the a pair, [tex]\rho (\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2)[/tex]:

[tex]\dot{\rho} (\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2,t) = D_1 \nabla^2_1 \rho (\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2,t) + D_2 \nabla^2_2 \rho (\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2,t) - k \left( \left\| \vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_2 \right\| \right) [/tex],

where the subscripts refer to the first and second particle, respectively. In 2D and polar coordinates, [tex]r_i[/tex] and [tex]\theta_i [/tex]:

[tex] \nabla^2_i = \frac{1}{r_i} \frac{\partial}{\partial r_i} r_i \frac{\partial}{\partial r_i} + \frac{1}{r_i^2} \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta_i} [/tex].

The domain is confined by two concentric spheres: [tex] 0 \leq \left\| \vec{r}_1 \right\| \leq R [/tex] and [tex] \left\| \vec{r}_2 \right\| \geq R [/tex]. The initial condition are spherically symmetric, i.e. only depends on the [tex]r_i[/tex]s. The reaction term is a function of the distance of the two particles, i.e. in 2D [tex] k( \left\| \vec{r}_1 - \vec{r}_2 \right\| ) = k( \sqrt{r_1^2 + r_2^2 - 2 r_1 r_2 \cos ( \theta_1-\theta_2)} ) [/tex]. I hoped to get rid of at least 1 coordinate by a variable transformation and separation of variables. However, so far I just could not come up with a separable problem. Do I really have to retain all 4 variables? Any suggestions of how to reduce this problem to something manageable are highly welcome. Eventually I will be interested in 3D and 4D as well.

Thank you,
Daniel
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Just throwing idea.

If the forces between particles 1 and 2 are conservative, try working in the centre of mass frame. In mechanics we use this frame to solve the central force motion and scattering problem.
 

Related Threads for: Reaction diffusion problem concentric spheres

Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Top