Readings for a general understanding of Quantum Field Theor?

Alexander83
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I have an undergraduate degree in Physics, but I've since specialized in more environmental applications of Physics. I've taken a few quantum Physics courses as part of my degree, but, if I'm being honest, what I took from those courses was more of a mathematical view of the field, such as how to solve the Schrodinger equation under certain scenarios.

Looking back on it, I'm not sure that I ever got a good intuitive feel for what these courses were actually about in terms of the bigger picture they were trying to describe nor how the material actually connected to real observable phenomena.

I'm not looking to become an expert in quantum phenomena, but I'd like to have a little be more of an intuitive understanding of what the field is about and its current state. In particular, I'm quite interested in looking into the view that fields are the fundamental entities in nature with particles as just excitations of fields, which I struggle to wrap my head around a little.

The issue I find is that quantum mechanics textbooks that deal with these topics end up being overly technical - I don't mind brushing up on my math, but I don't want to spend months doing so - while many popular texts go through such contortions to avoid using technical language that they almost make the material less understandable.

Are there any texts or books (or even open learning courses) that are good middle ground for this material? Maybe something written for a technical audience but for non-specialists?

Thanks in advance!

Alex
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Unfortunately with QFT you have hit the wall. There is no middle ground - you either do full blown QFT or you are left with highly unsatisfactory hand-wavey explanations.

My suggestion, with your background, is the following:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/019969933X/?tag=pfamazon01-20

He carefully explains exactly what's going on - but it will require your attention and take time. However it does not gloss over details and, for example, exactly spells out how particles come about - as well as why once you incorporate relativity with QM inevitably particles can be created and destroyed hence you must have a quantum field. Other books tend to have you fill in the gaps.

Thanks
Bill
 
bhobba said:
Unfortunately with QFT you have hit the wall. There is no middle ground - you either do full blown QFT or you are left with highly unsatisfactory hand-wavey explanations.

My suggestion, with your background, is the following:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/019969933X/?tag=pfamazon01-20

He carefully explains exactly what's going on - but it will require your attention and take time. However it does not gloss over details and, for example, exactly spells out how particles come about - as well as why once you incorporate relativity with QM inevitably particles can be created and destroyed hence you must have a quantum field. Other books tend to have you fill in the gaps.

Thanks
Bill

Thanks, Bill.
I'll have a look into the book and see if that helps. I appreciate the input!

Alex
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance" But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works. The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...
Back
Top