Real Scientists in Sci-Fi: Balancing Accuracy and Offense

  • Thread starter Thread starter kered rettop
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of incorporating real scientists into science fiction narratives, particularly regarding the balance between accuracy and sensitivity to potential offense. Participants explore the implications of using actual figures like Bohr and Feynman in fictional contexts, considering both creative freedom and cultural sensitivities.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about offending real scientists when depicting them in fictional scenarios, particularly in a satirical light.
  • Another suggests using pseudonyms for real scientists to avoid potential backlash, referencing a fictional name for Bohr.
  • A comment highlights the importance of disclaimers in fiction to clarify that any resemblance to actual persons is coincidental.
  • There is a humorous exchange regarding the logistics of a character being hidden behind bongo drums, with a playful suggestion about a spacetime anomaly affecting the character's size.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the appropriateness of using real scientists in fiction. Some advocate for caution and pseudonyms, while others engage in playful banter without resolving the underlying concerns.

Contextual Notes

The discussion reflects varying perspectives on cultural sensitivities in storytelling and the creative liberties authors may take when referencing real individuals.

kered rettop
Messages
259
Reaction score
95
I suppose it's not exclusive to sci-fi writing but sci-fi must run into this problem quite frequently. I would like to cast real scientists into a story (Bohr and Feynman for example). Obviously I have to guess the sort of things they might have said if they had really encountered the mock-science that underpins the story. I just want to avoid offending anyone or, getting into worse trouble.

I'm Ok with not naming them specifically. "One of the audience in the front row was half-hidden by a set of bongo drums" should make it clear whom I mean. But what about Bohr, who is impatient with the speaker because her theory sounds even more far-fetched than that of Everett? There's a lovely opportunity for some gentle satire, but is it acceptable in today's snowflake culture?

Apart from "if in doubt, cut it out", what do you think?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kered rettop said:
I would like to cast real scientists into a story

"Wrong again, Albert!" :smile:



1706036227207.png
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: BillTre, russ_watters and kered rettop
kered rettop said:
But what about Bohr
Just call him Nicholas Baker. As they say on FB "if you know you know."
 
kered rettop said:
"One of the audience in the front row was half-hidden by a set of bongo drums"
That must be an enormously large set of bongo drums, or else he was holding them in front of his face...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
Take a look at a novel. You see where it says "This novel is entirely a work of fiction. The names, characters and incidents portrayed in it are the work of the author’s imagination. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, events or localities is entirely coincidental.” That is not there for decoration. It's there for a reason.

If you are writing urban fantasy, feel free to amend this to "living, dead or undead".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kered rettop
Fair enough. Goodbye Neils, goodbye Richard. I shall miss you. :cry:
 
Last edited:
Mark44 said:
That must be an enormously large set of bongo drums, or else he was holding them in front of his face...
Do I have to spell everything out? If you must know, he'd just been shrunk down by a passing spacetime anomaly. :oldbiggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hornbein

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
20K