Is There a Need for a Hard Sci-Fi Magazine Focused on Real Ideas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ken Ucarp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scifi
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential need for a new hard science fiction magazine that focuses exclusively on scientifically grounded ideas, as opposed to fantasy or other genres. Participants explore the concept of creating a venue that features limited stories, reviews, and interviews with scientists, while seeking feedback on the viability of such a publication.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire for a hard sci-fi magazine that excludes fantasy elements, emphasizing the importance of real scientific ideas in storytelling.
  • Another participant suggests adding a forum and resources section to attract more readers, indicating that community engagement could enhance the magazine's appeal.
  • Some participants question whether there is a genuine demand for a new hard science fiction magazine, noting the prevalence of fantasy in existing outlets.
  • A suggestion is made to establish the magazine first and gauge interest organically, though concerns about the costs and efforts involved in startup are raised.
  • One participant shares a previous experience of gauging interest for a different project, indicating that community feedback can be valuable in assessing demand.
  • Another participant expresses support for the initiative, highlighting the importance of separating real science from fantasy to promote scientific understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the necessity of a new hard science fiction magazine. While some express support for the idea, others question the demand and feasibility, indicating a mix of opinions on the topic.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference the current landscape of sci-fi publications, noting a perceived imbalance towards fantasy, which may influence the potential success of a hard sci-fi magazine. There are also concerns about the costs associated with launching such a publication.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in hard science fiction, those involved in publishing, and individuals seeking to understand the intersection of science and storytelling may find this discussion relevant.

Ken Ucarp
Hi all. I've lurked around PF for awhile enough to realize real physics discussions go on here. Love it. I myself am an informed layman at best, who loves physics and math, but that love isn't returned - I was just never smart enough to do the real work beyond ideas.

I publish a couple non-sci-fi online magazines (won't mention them because I don't want you to think I'm selling something here.) I'm considering starting up a new Sci Fi site and would like your feedback.

There are numerous sci-fi and fantasy sites obviously, and many of those are good to great. BUT I'm wondering if there is a niche for a venue that focuses on hard sci fi only. No fantasy, no zombies, no nearly naked wo/men in the artwork, etc. I'm talking hard sci fi based on real ideas where if you take away the ideas, you've got nothing. Movies like Contact, Interstellar, 2001, etc. are examples of what I'm thinking, except in story form.

What do you think about this? I'm thinking it would feature limited stories (i.e. not just a story mill of anything remotely sciencey), possibly reviews of either hard sci fi movies, and or books, but also interviews with working scientists.

I appreciate your time in reading this far, and look forward to reading your feedback.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Been reading sci-fi magazines since 1965, always found them useful for finding new authors and killing time. If you add a forum (including a "meet the author" sub) and a "online resources" section you may draw more readers.

*Archives.org has over twenty years of "Galaxy" magazine online right now.
 
Noisy Rhysling said:
Been reading sci-fi magazines since 1965, always found them useful for finding new authors and killing time. If you add a forum (including a "meet the author" sub) and a "online resources" section you may draw more readers.

*Archives.org has over twenty years of "Galaxy" magazine online right now.
So you definitely know sci-fi! What do you think about what I mentioned in my post?
 
Ken Ucarp said:
So you definitely know sci-fi! What do you think about what I mentioned in my post?
Specific questions, please.

Also, these days having a fanfic "Ready Room" ("Watney's Spud Locker" for an inside joke?) where the piece is posted and a thread is attached for discussion, etc., might be good. Haven't read the current body of work in that area.
 
Can I take the lack of response to mean there's no need for a new hard science sci-fi magazine?
 
Ken Ucarp said:
Can I take the lack of response to mean there's no need for a new hard science sci-fi magazine?
Most of the people sitting on their hands are the "show us some reality" types, I think. Concepts come and go all the time. A suggestion would be to look at the successful online sites and see what they did right.
 
Noisy Rhysling said:
Most of the people sitting on their hands are the "show us some reality" types, I think. Concepts come and go all the time. A suggestion would be to look at the successful online sites and see what they did right.
Hmm, I'm not asking about features or approaches or how to gain audience. I'm specifically asking if there is a NEED for a new hard sci fi magazine. Evidently you're the only one here who reads sci fi :) (joking of course). I do like your ideas on features, etc. but it's the demand I'm asking about primarily. The survey I did of sci-fi outlets seems light on hard sci fi and heavy on fantasy. So like the person who would read the PF guide on Entanglement Entropy...would they also like to read a hard core sci fi story that incorporates those ideas? That kinda thing. I'm thinking there's a demand for that kind of thing. I'm starting to think I'm wrong.
 
Cart/horse, I think. I'd establish the 'zine and see if it strikes a cord. I don't know of a way to estimate unexpressed interest. L'audace, l'audace, toujours l'audace.
 
Except the cart and horse cost time, effort, and money (advertising mostly since startup costs, site/domain, etc are relatively cheap). So I try to gauge interest by posting in a forum like this. It's actually very helpful. Last year I was considering a site for musicians to recover lost instruments. I posted in a couple forums and found out there really was no need for it, even though every forum itself had a "lost instruments" thread! But something about a centralized site just didn't sit well with people. Anywho, that's my reasoning for posting here at least.
 
  • #10
Ken Ucarp said:
Except the cart and horse cost time, effort, and money (advertising mostly since startup costs, site/domain, etc are relatively cheap). So I try to gauge interest by posting in a forum like this. It's actually very helpful. Last year I was considering a site for musicians to recover lost instruments. I posted in a couple forums and found out there really was no need for it, even though every forum itself had a "lost instruments" thread! But something about a centralized site just didn't sit well with people. Anywho, that's my reasoning for posting here at least.
Try posting at The Skeptic's Guide to the Universe forum, Sciforums, Bad Science Forums, The Thinking Atheist Forums, etc.
 
  • #11
Ken Ucarp said:
Hi all. I've lurked around PF for awhile enough to realize real physics discussions go on here. Love it. I myself am an informed layman at best, who loves physics and math, but that love isn't returned - I was just never smart enough to do the real work beyond ideas.

I publish a couple non-sci-fi online magazines (won't mention them because I don't want you to think I'm selling something here.) I'm considering starting up a new Sci Fi site and would like your feedback.

There are numerous sci-fi and fantasy sites obviously, and many of those are good to great. BUT I'm wondering if there is a niche for a venue that focuses on hard sci fi only. No fantasy, no zombies, no nearly naked wo/men in the artwork, etc. I'm talking hard sci fi based on real ideas where if you take away the ideas, you've got nothing. Movies like Contact, Interstellar, 2001, etc. are examples of what I'm thinking, except in story form.

What do you think about this? I'm thinking it would feature limited stories (i.e. not just a story mill of anything remotely sciencey), possibly reviews of either hard sci fi movies, and or books, but also interviews with working scientists.

I appreciate your time in reading this far, and look forward to reading your feedback.
I totally support your idea. Should you need any help, I would do all I can. It's really upsetting when fantasy and magic are mixed together with real Sci-Fi, because it misleads the public and further alienates efforts to popularise real science among the general public. This is indeed a commendable initiative. Books, documentaries, reviews, interviews, websites, lectures, movies, blogs, podcasts, discussions, ideas, and unpublished works could well constitute a rich content.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
44
Views
14K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
13K