Really basic, simple concept question

  • Thread starter Thread starter phys-lexic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concept
AI Thread Summary
Converting metric SI units requires understanding the relationship between different units, particularly when dealing with volume and density. For example, converting 2.7 g/cm^3 to g/m^3 involves recognizing that 1 cm^3 equals 1E-6 m^3, leading to the conversion resulting in 2.7E6 g/m^3. The general rule for converting units is to apply the conversion factor consistently across dimensions, whether for area or volume. When converting units, squaring or cubing the conversion factor is necessary for area or volume, respectively. Mastery of these rules simplifies the process of unit conversion in scientific contexts.
phys-lexic
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
it's been a while since I've taken any math based classes (all chem and bio for the last few years)... kinda embaressing but what are the rules in converting metric system s.i. units?

i.e. with 2.7 g/cm^3 into meters

would it be .027g/m^3 or would it be 2.7E-6 g/m^3 (cuz i know it would be the second one with volume, but since it is a denomenator here I am not 100% sure)


... what are the general rules when converting units that aren't simply meter or grams, etc.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It can be tricky.
1cm = 0.01m
so 1cm^2 = (0.01m)^2 = 0.0001 m^2
1/cm = 1/0.01m
1/cm^2 = 1/0.01m^2 = 1/0.0001 m^2
1/cm^3 = 1/0.01m^3 = 1/0.000001 m^3 = 1/10^-6 m^3 = 10^6 m^3
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top