Rear leaf suspension modifications

  • Thread starter Thread starter Charlie Cheap
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Suspension
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around modifications to the rear leaf suspension of a 1967 Sunbeam Alpine, particularly focusing on the choice between rubber and polyurethane bushings. Participants explore the implications of these choices on comfort and handling for a street car intended for long trips.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares their experience with poly bushings in a Mustang, noting improved handling but increased road feel, which may be undesirable for a daily driver.
  • Another participant suggests that stock rubber bushings provide a good balance between comfort and performance, arguing that engineers have optimized this choice over time.
  • A different participant mentions that for maximum performance, metal bushings could be considered, but acknowledges that poly bushings may lead to a harsher ride.
  • There is a discussion about the historical context of drag racing experiences, with participants sharing personal anecdotes and technical details about past vehicles and races, which may not directly relate to the suspension topic but provide insight into the participants' backgrounds.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the suitability of rubber versus poly bushings, with no consensus reached on the best choice for the suspension modifications. Some advocate for stock rubber bushings for comfort, while others support the use of poly bushings for improved handling.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference their experiences and the technical aspects of drag racing, which may influence their perspectives on vehicle modifications. There is an acknowledgment of the trade-offs between comfort and performance, but specific assumptions about ride quality and handling characteristics remain unresolved.

Charlie Cheap
Messages
76
Reaction score
16
I am building a 1967 Sunbeam Alpine and installing a Ford Lima 2.3 modified 4-cylinder with an A4LD overdrive automatic. At 75 I still love to drive but this is for long trips. That sounds crazy for a car with an 89 in wheelbase, but it is what I am doing.

The rear leaf suspension will be dismantled and rebuilt adding gas shocks and Teflon between the leafs. My question relates to Rubber or Poly bushings. I installed Poly bushings on my 65 Mustang and it helped overall handling on wavy roads. However, they seem to add road-feel to the driver, that is a little more than I want in a short wheel-base daily driver sportscar. I am not going racing, but may drive it across the US.

I have heard use polyethylene only in the front of the spring, while others say only in the rear, because the front transmits load to the chassis, right under the seats. I plan to use poly in the front sway-bar only, with rubber everywhere else. Control is my goal for a street car without the loss of too much comfort. For 50 years I built Street Rods but this is my first sportscar. Thanks.

IMG_2092.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2092.JPG
    IMG_2092.JPG
    72.9 KB · Views: 597
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
ifin you want smooth rude go with stock bushings. Engineers spent thousands of hours and millions of dollars developing a good compromise between comfort and performance. If you want maximum performance go with metal bushings. The in between is poly bushings but as you have found out, they ride a little harsher. Put in the stock rubbers as they will out live you and me on this ride! I been bending wrenches on race cars since 1964.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Thanks Mike. I got out of drag racing my Corvette powered 40 Ford coupe in 69, after being out run by a 413 HEMI powered station wagon. It was IHRA rules and his car went by title weight, while mine was weighed in at 3000 lbs. Because mine was a Chevy in a Ford I had to spot him one light. As I got into 3rd I was at his door and gaining fast...then cubic HP took over, and he beat me by a car of daylight. That was a factory Hot Rod Wagon and I had a much modified SBC and 4-speed. I quit that day. If the factory can out-run a Hot Rod, WHY BOTHER! That was 69 and ever since factory sponsors have controlled drag racing, putting us home-builders out of business. Thanks again for the answer.
 
my first drag race car was working on a 1963 Plymouth 426 Stage 3 factory drag car. It had factory all aluminum front end, fresh ram air hood scoop and tow carter AFB carbs on a stock short ram manifold. I would guess you were doomed from the start going up against the Chrysler 413 Wedge. Chrysler never had a stock HEMI of 413 cid. That race combination was developed over many many years by t he famed Ramcharger race team. This was a group of Chrysler factory engineers who loved drag racing and developed the whole muscle car program on their own after hours at the drag strip. These engines were flat out torque monsters and topped out at 7000 RPM. To beast them you needed a high revving small block Chevy turning 9500 RPM in a light chassis. Add to it the fact your 40 Coupe was as aero dynamaic as a brick compared to the sleeker Dodge wagon, and the extra rear end weight the wagon had, AND you had to spot him a light...well no wonder you got pulled on the high end.
 
Thanks for the reminder Mike. Like most drag racers when I think of Chrysler 413, I think HEMI. Naturally I try to make the match-up look like I was robbed, but I just got out run by cubic inches, plexi-glass windows, no rear seats, Bucron rear tires (remember those?), and a factory race car. In reality the 40 coupe is very aerodynamic, but even with a 283 bored to 292", FI double hump heads (2.02 valves), Duntov solid Vette cam, 4-barrel, Doug Thorley headers, Mallory ignition, Schafer (sp), flywheel, Hayes clutch, Traction Masters and an Olds 4.11 (I think) rearend, it was not enough! At the time I was a Chevy guy and "assumed" I got beat by a HEMI. The other thing I remember about Green Valley Raceway is, I got to talk to Linda Vaughn. She was almost wearing a very low-cut top and very short mini-skirt. I had a picture...but the wife trashed it years ago. Thanks again for the Wedge reminder.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K