Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Rearranging neutrino expression in see-saw maths

  1. Dec 14, 2014 #1

    I'm working through the see-saw mechanism.
    This is currently from the one-generation section.
    (I haven't got to the three generation workings yet... although i'm guessing I'll come across something very similar in the three generation model)

    Could someone please tell me if it is correct or not that
    [itex] \bar{\nu_R} \nu_R^c = \bar{\nu_R^c} \nu_R [/itex]

    and if it is, could I please have a hint as to why / how to prove this.

    Thank you in advance!
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 14, 2014 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    It is not true, the fields on the right are not conjugated while those on the left are. You might want to add the hermitian conjugate on both sides.
  4. Dec 14, 2014 #3
    ahhhhh thankyou, I think I have it .....

    [itex] \overline{ \nu_R^c} \nu_R + h.c. = \overline{ \nu_R} \nu_R^c + h.c. [/itex]

    [itex] (1) + h.c. = (2) + h.c. [/itex]

    [itex] (1)^{\dagger} +h.c. = (2) + h.c. [/itex]


    [itex] (1)^{\dagger} = ( \overline{ \nu_R^c} \nu_R )^{\dagger} [/itex]

    [itex] = ( - \nu_R^T C ^{\dagger} \nu_R )^{\dagger} [/itex]

    [itex] = \nu_R^{\dagger} C \nu_R^{\ast} [/itex]

    [itex] = \nu_R^{\dagger}\gamma^0 C \gamma^0 \nu_R^{\ast} [/itex]

    [itex] = \overline{\nu_R} C \gamma^0 \nu_R^{\ast} [/itex]

    [itex] = \overline{\nu_R} C \overline{\nu_R^{T} } [/itex]

    [itex] = \overline{\nu_R} \nu_R^{c} = (2) [/itex]
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook