Rearranging neutrino expression in see-saw maths

  • #1

Main Question or Discussion Point

Hello

I'm working through the see-saw mechanism.
This is currently from the one-generation section.
(I haven't got to the three generation workings yet... although i'm guessing I'll come across something very similar in the three generation model)

Could someone please tell me if it is correct or not that
[itex] \bar{\nu_R} \nu_R^c = \bar{\nu_R^c} \nu_R [/itex]

and if it is, could I please have a hint as to why / how to prove this.

Thank you in advance!
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,680
6,460
It is not true, the fields on the right are not conjugated while those on the left are. You might want to add the hermitian conjugate on both sides.
 
  • #3
ahhhhh thankyou, I think I have it .....

[itex] \overline{ \nu_R^c} \nu_R + h.c. = \overline{ \nu_R} \nu_R^c + h.c. [/itex]

[itex] (1) + h.c. = (2) + h.c. [/itex]

[itex] (1)^{\dagger} +h.c. = (2) + h.c. [/itex]


Proof

[itex] (1)^{\dagger} = ( \overline{ \nu_R^c} \nu_R )^{\dagger} [/itex]

[itex] = ( - \nu_R^T C ^{\dagger} \nu_R )^{\dagger} [/itex]

[itex] = \nu_R^{\dagger} C \nu_R^{\ast} [/itex]

[itex] = \nu_R^{\dagger}\gamma^0 C \gamma^0 \nu_R^{\ast} [/itex]

[itex] = \overline{\nu_R} C \gamma^0 \nu_R^{\ast} [/itex]

[itex] = \overline{\nu_R} C \overline{\nu_R^{T} } [/itex]

[itex] = \overline{\nu_R} \nu_R^{c} = (2) [/itex]
 

Related Threads on Rearranging neutrino expression in see-saw maths

  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
863
Replies
6
Views
881
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
851
  • Last Post
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
837
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Top