Reasonable measurement of both coordinate and momentum?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of defining an observable operator that can measure both the approximate coordinate and momentum of a particle, particularly in the context of quantum tunneling. Participants explore whether it is reasonable to inquire about a particle's momentum while it is inside a barrier, considering the implications of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the possibility of defining a reasonable observable operator for measuring both coordinate and momentum without violating the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.
  • Another participant suggests using a Fourier transformation of the particle's wavefunction limited to a specific region to derive a momentum distribution, though they express uncertainty about its meaningfulness.
  • A participant mentions the existence of Positive Operator-Valued Measures (POVMs) for simultaneous but inaccurate measurements of position and momentum.
  • Further elaboration on POVMs is provided, highlighting their role as a generalization of traditional measurements in quantum mechanics and referencing Gleason's theorem as related to this topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation and implications of measuring momentum within a barrier, with no consensus reached on the feasibility or meaningfulness of such measurements.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the definitions of observables and the limitations of measurements in quantum mechanics, particularly regarding the Heisenberg uncertainty principle and the interpretation of quantum states.

MichPod
Messages
231
Reaction score
46
Can a reasonable observable operator be defined which measures a two-component observable, first component for the approximate coordinate and the second for the approximate momentum (so that the precision of each measurement do not contradict Heisenberg inequality)?

I am actually thinking of how to define formally a problem of measuring of the particle speed inside a barrier (for quantum tunneling effect), i.e. can we reasonably ask what is the momentum of the particle inside the barrier? We, of course, can ask what is the average momentum or a momentum distribution, but what about asking what is the momentum IF the particle COULD BE found in some region? Can this sort of problems be reasonably interpreted in the terms of QM?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could make a Fourier transformation of "particle wavefunction in space but limited to the box" and consider this as momentum distribution for the particle in the box. I'm not sure how meaningful that would be, however.
 
There are POVMs for the simultaneous (and inaccurate) measurement of position and momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba and dextercioby
A. Neumaier said:
There are POVMs for the simultaneous (and inaccurate) measurement of position and momentum.

A POVM is a generalization of the normal measurements you learned about in your QM textbooks. Physically it comes about from using a probe to observe a system then observing the probe, but these days is often taken as the fundamental kind of observation in QM. The important Gleason's theorem, which has a reputation as hard to prove, is much easier using POVM's than the normal Von-Neumann measurements, for example.

See:
http://www.quantum.umb.edu/Jacobs/QMT/QMT_Chapter1.pdf

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K