Reconstruction Primordial Fluctuations from Temperature Anisotropy

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter maverick280857
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluctuations Temperature
maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Reconstructing Primordial Fluctuations from Temperature Anisotropy

Hi

For a summer project, I am required to read the paper "Measuring Primordial Non-Gaussianity in the Cosmic Microwave Background", Komatsu et al (http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0305189v2).

On page 3, the following arguments describe the method of reconstructing primordial fluctuations from temperature anisotropy:

(The point I am stuck at is given below and is boldfaced...you may want to scroll down skipping the background, which I have included to define the notation.)

The harmonic coefficients of the CMB anisotropy are given by

[tex]a_{lm} = \frac{1}{T}\int d^{2}\hat{n}\Delta T(\hat{n})Y_{lm}^{*}(\hat{n})[/tex]

They are related to the primordial fluctuations as

[tex]a_{lm} = b_{l}\int r^{2}dr \left[\Phi_{lm}(r)\alpha_{l}^{adi}(r) + S_{lm}(r)\alpha_{l}^{iso}(r)\right] + n_{lm}[/tex]

where [itex]\Phi_{lm}(r)[/itex] and [itex]S_{\lm}(r)[/itex] are the harmonic coefficients of the fluctuations at a given comoving distance [itex]r = |x|[/itex], [itex]b_{lm}[/itex] is the beam transfer function and [itex]n_{lm}[/itex] is the harmonic coefficient of noise.

Here,

[tex]\alpha_{l} \equiv \frac{2}{\pi}\int k^{2}dk g_{Tl}(k)j_{l}(kr)[/tex]

where [itex]g_{Tl}[/itex] is the radiation transfer function of either adiabatic (adi) or isocurvature (iso) perturbation; [itex]j_{l}(kr)[/itex] is the spherical Bessel function of order [itex]l[/itex].

This is where I'm stuck:

Next, assumuming that [itex]\Phi(x)[/itex] dominates, we try to reconstruct [itex]\Phi(x)[/itex] from the observed [itex]\Delta T(\hat{n})[/itex]. A linear filter, [itex]O_{l}(r)[/itex], which reconstructs the underlying field, can be obtained by minimizing variance of difference between the filtered field [itex]O_{l}(r)a_{lm}[/itex] and the underlying field [itex]\Phi_{lm}(r)[/itex]. By evaluating

[tex]\frac{\partial}{\partial O_{l}(r)}\left\langle\left|O_{l}(r)a_{lm}-\Phi_{lm}(r)\right|^{2}\right\rangle = 0[/tex]

one obtains a solution for the filter as

[tex]O_{l}(r) = \frac{\beta_{l}(r)b_{l}}{C_{l}}[/tex]

where the function [itex]\beta_{l}(r)[/itex] is given by

[tex]\beta_{l}(r) \equiv \frac{2}{\pi} \int k^{2}dk P(k) g_{Tl}(k)j_{l}(kr)[/tex]

and [itex]P(k)[/itex] is the power spectrum of [itex]\Phi[/itex].

(Here [itex]C_{l} \equiv C_{l}^{th}b_{l}^{2} + \sigma_{0}^2[/itex] includes the effects of [itex]b_{l}[/itex] and noise, where [itex]C_{l}^{th}[/itex] is the theoretical power spectrum.)

I can't see how the authors have obtained the solution for the filter from the partial differential equation. I would be grateful if someone could shed light on this step.

Thanks in advance.

Vivek.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
This is a very specific question. I would suggest that you try a few advanced textbooks (although you probably have done this already?). Other than that, review papers, in this case a review of CMB physics and measurement, often go into more detail about methods that other papers do not have the space for.

Hopefully someone else will be able to provide a more useful answer, but that is as much as I can suggest.
 
My advice would be to email the author of the paper - they should be able to offer the best advice.
 
Thank you matt.o and Wallace.

I believe this is a construction of a Wiener filter, but I am not sure how the PDE has resulted in the given solution. I have mailed the author of the paper.
 
Last edited:
What is the expectation taken over?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K