Recycling Garbage: Can We Break Down Molecules to their Basic Elements?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter tcgastevenson
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the feasibility of breaking down molecules into their basic elemental components for recycling purposes. Participants explore the theoretical and practical implications of such processes, including technological, energetic, and economic considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why it is not possible to disintegrate molecules into their base atomic elements for recycling, suggesting potential technological or cost barriers.
  • Another participant argues that continuous chemical reactions and bonding among elements make it extraordinarily difficult to separate and organize each atom with current technologies.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that breaking molecules apart requires energy, and the energy needed to revert products back to their base elements is significant, potentially negating the benefits of such processes.
  • One participant notes that nature already performs this breakdown process over millions of years, implying a natural recycling mechanism.
  • A mention of a company, Star Tech, indicates that there are ongoing efforts to develop technology (like a plasma torch) aimed at breaking down garbage into elemental components, though the effectiveness of this technology is questioned.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility and practicality of breaking down molecules into elements. There is no consensus on whether it is currently possible or economically viable, and multiple competing perspectives on the challenges involved are present.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to current technological capabilities, energy requirements, and the natural processes involved in molecular breakdown, but does not resolve these complexities.

tcgastevenson
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am sure the answer is obvious, but for some reason it escapes me. So here goes.

Radiation can be used to break apart molecules, or so says a geology textbook I was reading. And I know the folks at CERN and Fermi-lab (spelling?) are working with atomic particle matter, and even anti-matter according to an article I read recently, so why can't we disintegrate molecules into their base atomic elements, then recycle the elemental matter?

In other words, why can we not take garbage to be recycled, and break it down to its basic elemental molecular structure and separate it into pure masses of the elements from which it is composed? Is it a matter of not possessing the technology to do it? Is it cost prohibitive? Is it even possible? Am I making any sense?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Firstly, I'd imagine it to be extraordinarily difficult to hinder the continuous chemical reactions/bonding occurring amongst the elements. Secondly to separate and organize each atom isn't possible with current technologies. Advancements in nanotechnology may increase cost effectiveness and technological capabilities in the future.
 
To break molecules apart requires energy. A chemical reaction such as burning gasoline gives off energy, it is Exothermic. However, to break those products of the reaction back into their previous/base elements, requires just as much energy as you got out of burning it in the first place. Gotta conserve that energy. =)

So not only is it a question of having the technology, we also have to account for the costs of the energy used to do this. So for almost everything that is garbage, there is almost no reason to attempt this.
 
Technically we are already doing this exact thing passively. You just have to wait a few million years for the process to finish.
 
A company called star tech is working on this , And they have a prototype
watch this video and they explain there plasma torch and how it breaks down the garbage and turns it into elements . I don't know how good it works though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K