Redirecting Airflow with a Curved Surface

  • Context: HVAC 
  • Thread starter Thread starter iXod
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Airflow Fan
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods to redirect airflow from a fan positioned at a window to improve ventilation in a workspace. Participants explore various designs, including curved surfaces and alternative materials, while considering airflow efficiency and potential modifications to the fan's operation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes using a curved surface to redirect airflow from a fan, questioning whether a constant-radius curve or another shape would be more effective.
  • Another participant suggests that a larger radius reduces airflow restriction, referencing a chart from the ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals.
  • There is a mention of using turning vanes in a square elbow to minimize airflow restriction, with a recommendation to keep them accessible for cleaning.
  • A participant decides to proceed with a 36” radius curved surface made of plywood and HDPE, seeking information on the maximum CFM limit of a window screen.
  • One suggestion is made to consider using a sail instead of plywood for space efficiency, prompting questions about its functionality.
  • Participants discuss the possibility of reversing the fan's flow direction to allow fresh air to enter through screened windows while exhausting warmer air, with additional suggestions for ceiling fans to enhance airflow.
  • Concerns are raised about vehicle exhaust from idling vehicles near the building, affecting air quality, leading to discussions about the design of the inlet and exhaust system.
  • There are inquiries about integrating microcontrollers to manage the ventilation system based on vehicle activity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the design and functionality of airflow systems, with no consensus reached on the optimal approach or materials to use.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions about airflow dynamics, material properties, and environmental conditions affecting the effectiveness of their proposed solutions. Specific limitations regarding the effectiveness of different designs and the impact of external factors like vehicle exhaust remain unresolved.

iXod
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
I want to change a fan's airflow direction
I want to change the direction of airflow from a fan. The fan is covering a window so as to bring fresh air into the workspace, exhausting warmer air through open windows throughout the workspace.

It would help cool those in the immediate area of the fan if it were blowing 90 degrees to the current orientation, but in order to draw in fresh air, the fan must remain where it is, covering the window.

I am considering building a simple curved surface (an arc of 90 degrees) sandwiched between 2 flat surfaces. The fan will blow onto this arc and the air will exit the arc, changes by 90 degrees.

For best effectiveness, should this curve be a constant-radius? Or some other shape?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The larger the radius, the less the restriction, and the more air will flow. The following chart, from my 1985 copy of the ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals shows the effect of the radius:
Elbow.jpg

The restriction is a function of the Co number - smaller number is less restriction.

If space is tight, you can use a square elbow with turning vanes:
Turning vanes.jpg


Turning vanes in a square elbow can reduce the restriction to almost the same as a large radius elbow. They give you the option of building a square elbow, installing it, and checking the airflow. If the airflow decreases too much from the fan without the elbow, just add turning vanes.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, berkeman and BillTre
Keep the turning vanes some distance apart for access.
If there is no filter, they will need to be cleaned regularly.
 
Thanks for your replies. I’ve decided to use my original design, a simple 36” radius curved surface built with 1/4” plywood. The radius surface will be HDPE.

My next task is to determine what the max CFM this window opening can support.

What is the CFM limit (per sq.in. or sq.ft.) of common (1/8”?) window screen?

Thank you.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Just out of convenience I would suggest considering a sail instead of plywood. Can free up a lot of space.
 
Please explain. Is a sail a piece of fabric attached so as to give a radius when “inflated” by the fan’s air pressure? I’d never heard of this. Sounds simple.
 
Last edited:
iXod said:
Is a sail a piece of fabric attached so as to give a radius when “inflated” by the fan’s air pressure? I’d never heard if this. Sounds simple.
So simple that you came up with a plan just after hearing about it for the first time :wink:

Harder to make it anything 'optimal' than plywood, but can be simply stowed away in a bag at autumn.
 
Considering reversing the flow of the existing fan outwards.
Fresh air will come in through each of the screened windows, sweaping the whole space at lower speed while collecting heat from persons and equipment, just to be exhausted, finally collecting the heat produced by the fan motor, through a single window (back draft damper or screen to keep insects out when the fan is off).

For areas that are not naturally reached by that flow of air, you could install ceiling fans or regular horizontally blowing fans.
I believe that you could make more workers comfortable that way, avoiding strong drafts of air inside the space.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Add to my previous post: there are vehicles around the building that idle while parking, loading, the exhaust from these can be drawn in through open windows. This was one of the main reasons for preferring a single inlet (it’s high in a loft) and multiple exhaust windows.

Were the neighbors different, the dongle outlet is preferable.

Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #10
iXod said:
Add to my previous post: there are vehicles around the building that idle while parking, loading, the exhaust from these can be drawn in through open windows. This was one of the main reasons for preferring a single inlet (it’s high in a loft) and multiple exhaust windows.

Were the neighbors different, the dongle outlet is preferable.

Thanks.
In that case, positive pressure is better.
Could you install a regular horizontal fan blowing 90 degrees across the airstream of the inlet fan?
Could your inlet fan collect the truck’s fumes as well?
 
  • #11
iXod said:
Add to my previous post: there are vehicles around the building that idle while parking, loading, the exhaust from these can be drawn in through open windows. This was one of the main reasons for preferring a single inlet (it’s high in a loft) and multiple exhaust windows.

Were the neighbors different, the dongle outlet is preferable.

Thanks.
Have you done any programming with Arduino or other microcontrollers so far? You could to a fairly simple system that senses the vehicles parked and idling causing the exhaust problem, and pause the system...
 
  • #12
iXod said:
idle while parking
Put up "No Idling" signs

BoB
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K